Skip to main content
Glama
Sign In
ModelRadar MCP

ModelRadar MCP

by legifx
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
JavaScript
Remote

modelradar_latest

Fetch the latest model releases from ModelRadar's RSS feed, including title, lab, date, link, and summary.

Instructions

Latest model releases straight from the ModelRadar RSS feed (title, lab, date, link, summary).

Tool call template

This tool declares no required parameters. Add optional parameters from the input schema as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {},
    "name": "modelradar_latest"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
limitNo

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. First observedv1.0.0

TDQS

B3.4/5.0
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries the burden. It discloses the data source (RSS feed) and output fields, implying a read-only operation. However, it does not explicitly state safety characteristics, rate limits, or potential side effects, though for a simple fetcher this is minimally sufficient.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, concise sentence that front-loads the primary purpose and enumerates returned fields. Every word adds value, with no redundant or filler content.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness3/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The tool is simple with one optional parameter and no output schema, so the description covers the core function well. However, the lack of explanation for `limit` and absence of alternative tool guidance leaves minor gaps that could confuse an agent trying to use it optimally.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters2/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0% and the description does not explain the `limit` parameter. The name 'limit' hints at its purpose, but the agent receives no explicit confirmation that it controls the number of results returned. The description should at least mention that limit caps the output.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool fetches 'Latest model releases' from the ModelRadar RSS feed, listing the exact fields returned (title, lab, date, link, summary). This distinguishes it from sibling tools like search or get by emphasizing recency.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description gives no explicit guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives such as modelradar_search or modelradar_get. It implies it is for recent releases but does not state exclusions or direct users to other tools for different needs.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Deploy Server

Other Tools