Legalithm
OfficialRelated Servers
Alternatives to Legalithm
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceMCP server for EU AI Act compliance classification with multi-jurisdiction overlay across 8 frameworks (NIST AI RMF, ISO 42001, GDPR, HIPAA, Colorado SB 24-205). Provides deterministic risk classifier (quick_risk_class) and Claude-powered Annex III deep classifier (classify_annex3) with remediation actions.22 npmMIT

conformi-searchofficial
AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceInstallable MCP server for EU legal research with verifiable CELEX citations from the EUR-Lex corpus (DE/EN/FR).21MIT
LexAPI MCPofficial
AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceEnables querying EU legal documents, case law, and citation graphs through natural language using the LexAPI.1025 npm3MIT
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceEnables EU AI Act compliance assessment by classifying AI systems, listing obligations, computing deadlines, and scanning repos for required documentation, all running locally.42MIT
- FlicenseAqualityBmaintenance40 regulation-and-deadline linters (CRA/CSAF, PCI DSS 6.4.3, WCAG 2.1 AA, DORA, NIS2, EU AI Act, KSeF, NF-e) that AI agents call over MCP. Free checks on the open file; licence key unlocks workspace scan and CI exit code.3-
- AlicenseAqualityFmaintenanceQuery 37 EU regulations — from GDPR and AI Act to DORA, MiFID II, eIDAS, Medical Device Regulation, and more — directly from Claude, Cursor, or any MCP-compatible client.14100 npm25Apache 2.0
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceScans codebases for AI system usage and generates EU AI Act compliance reports.431 npmMIT
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceScans codebases for AI frameworks, checks EU AI Act compliance, and generates compliance reports, roadmaps, and audit-ready packages.1611MIT
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceLets AI assistants classify an AI system under the EU AI Act, returning risk tier, obligations, and deadlines based on a plain-English description of the product.45 npmMIT
TDQS
Scored across 7 tools
Each tool addresses a distinct task: classification, obligation lookup, disclosure generation, agent-specific disclosure, code-surface discovery, taxonomy reference, and record lookup. The mild ambiguity between generate_disclosure and generate_agent_disclosure is resolved by their clear scope descriptions, so agents should rarely misselect.
Six of seven tools follow a clear verb_noun snake_case pattern: classify, explain_obligation, generate_disclosure, check_record, generate_agent_disclosure, and discover_ai_surfaces. agent_disclosure_taxonomy breaks the verb convention by starting with a noun, but it is still consistent in style and predictable.
Seven tools is well-scoped for an EU AI Act compliance assistant: classification, obligations, disclosure generation, agent disclosure, code analysis, taxonomy reference, and record lookup. Each tool earns its place, and the count is neither bloated nor thin.
The core workflow—classify a use case, look up obligations, generate the correct disclosure, analyze code surfaces, and check a compliance record—is covered. Minor gaps exist, such as no create/update path for Trust Center records and no broader EU AI Act article search, but agents can complete the main intended tasks without dead ends.