mcpdemos
Related Servers
Alternatives to mcpdemos
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables AI clients to connect to example tools, resources, and prompts over MCP, demonstrating integration with IDEs, chatbots, and agent frameworks.-
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceEnables developers to build, run locally with debugging, and deploy to the cloud custom remote MCP endpoints hosted on Azure Functions, with built-in Microsoft Entra authentication. Sample projects demonstrate snippet CRUD and QR code tools, resource templates, prompt workflows, and an interactive weather demo UI.-
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceProvides runnable samples demonstrating how MCP tools can return deterministic, interactive UIs using HTML, UI5 Web Components, UI Integration Cards, and host-orchestrated SAP transport data.10-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceA demo MCP server showcasing every MCP capability with fake logic, including tools, resources, prompts, progress, cancellation, elicitation, sampling, roots, and subscriptions, over Streamable HTTP, HTTP+SSE, and stdio transports.9 npmMIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenancePublishes sample Python implementations that expose tools such as snippet CRUD, QR code generation and batch operations, resources, and prompts like code review checklists and doc generation, plus an interactive weather app, to MCP clients. These can be run locally with debugging or deployed to Azure with built-in Microsoft Entra authentication.-
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceProvides production-ready examples of MCP servers that demonstrate building rich, interactive UI components for ChatGPT, including authentication flows, product search with carousels, shopping cart checkout, and membership signups with state management.-
TDQS
Scored across 16 tools
Each tool targets a distinct demo scenario and action, with no overlapping purposes. The demoX prefix clearly groups related tools, and individual tool descriptions specify unique roles (e.g., start vs. confirm vs. check progress).
All tools follow a consistent snake_case verb_noun pattern (e.g., demo1_polite_cli, demo2_scaffold_start, demo3_request_consent). The naming is uniform across all 16 tools with no deviations.
With 16 tools, the count is slightly above the ideal 3-15 range, but given the multi-demo scope, it remains well-scoped. Each tool serves a distinct purpose, and none feel redundant.
The tool surface covers the core workflows for each demo scenario (e.g., scaffolding, consent flow, pipeline management, palette operations). Minor gaps exist (e.g., no tool to reset a demo), but overall it supports the intended demonstrations adequately.