Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to mac-pilot-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      macOS MCP server that enables AI agents to directly control the host OS, including mouse, keyboard, windows, files, and accessibility automation for computer-use workflows.
      1
      -
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      MCP server that enables AI to fully control macOS — mouse, keyboard, terminal, screenshots, window management, UI element detection, and provides AI-optimized information reporting.
      36
      19 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      An MCP server for macOS that enables AI agents to control the desktop GUI through keyboard input, mouse actions, and screen captures. It provides stable low-level primitives for UI automation and agent-driven desktop workflows.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Standalone MCP server that gives AI agents full GUI control over macOS — screenshots, mouse, keyboard, apps, clipboard, and multi-display — with zero private dependencies.
      19
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      An MCP server that gives any AI assistant eyes and hands on your desktop — screenshots, clicking, typing, OCR, window management, accessibility-tree queries, workflow recording.
      5
      Apache 2.0

    TDQS

    A4.3/5.0

    Scored across 11 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool targets a distinct aspect of macOS automation: mac_run executes commands, mac_state reads system state, mac_clipboard manages the clipboard, mac_find_ui inspects UI elements, mac_screenshot captures the screen, and the recipe* tools cover the full recipe lifecycle. There is no meaningful overlap; even mac_run and mac_recipe_run are clearly separated by ad-hoc vs saved workflows.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    All tools share the mac_ prefix and use snake_case, but the verb/noun order varies: mac_run and mac_find_ui are verb-first, while mac_state and mac_permissions are noun-first, and recipe tools use recipe_verb (e.g., mac_recipe_export). This is a minor deviation from a fully consistent verb_noun pattern but remains predictable and readable.

    Tool Count5/5

    With 11 tools, the server is well-scoped for macOS automation. It covers command execution, state inspection, clipboard, UI inspection, screenshots, permissions, and a complete recipe subsystem without bloating. The count sits comfortably in the ideal 3-15 range and each tool earns its place.

    Completeness4/5

    The tool surface covers core automation actions (run, state, UI, screenshot, clipboard) and a full recipe lifecycle (save, run, search, export, import). Minor gaps exist, such as no explicit recipe deletion or a dedicated list-all tool, but these can be worked around via search or export, so agent workflows are not severely hindered.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues