Skip to main content
Glama
leenbj

MCP Feedback Enhanced

by leenbj

Related Servers

Alternatives to MCP Feedback Enhanced

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to request human input through a web interface, allowing them to pause execution and wait for responses via interactive tools like single questions, multiple choice selections, hypothesis challenges, and decision workflows.
      5 npm
      2
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI models to ask users questions through a local web interface, supporting batch questions, multi-select, and free text for human-in-the-loop interactions.
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to collect interactive user feedback through a modern GUI that supports text input, multiple image uploads (via file selection or clipboard paste), allowing users to provide comprehensive feedback with screenshots and comments.
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables human-in-the-loop checkpoints for AI agents, allowing them to pause and wait for human input via a web UI, then seamlessly resume execution.
      39
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to request human input through a web interface during execution. Supports single questions, multiple choice selections, hypothesis challenges, and decision workflows for human-in-the-loop interactions.
      5 npm
      MIT

    TDQS

    B3.1/5.0

    Scored across 2 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    The two tools serve clearly different purposes: interactive_feedback collects user feedback, while get_system_info retrieves environment details. There is no overlap or ambiguous boundary between them.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Both tools use snake_case, which is consistent. However, get_system_info follows a verb_noun pattern while interactive_feedback is adjective_noun, a minor deviation from a strict convention.

    Tool Count3/5

    With only two tools, the server is very thin even for a focused feedback utility. It provides one primary action and one auxiliary utility, landing at the borderline of 'too few'.

    Completeness3/5

    The surface covers feedback collection (text, images, command validation) and system information. It lacks obvious lifecycle operations such as listing, retrieving, or clearing past feedback, which may limit real-world use.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues