delete_file
Delete files or folders by providing the path. Enables file removal through natural language instructions.
Instructions
删除文件或文件夹
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| path | Yes | 要删除的文件或文件夹路径 |
Delete files or folders by providing the path. Enables file removal through natural language instructions.
删除文件或文件夹
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| path | Yes | 要删除的文件或文件夹路径 |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
With no annotations, the description carries full burden but offers minimal behavioral info. It does not disclose whether deletion is permanent, reversible, or requires permissions, nor any side effects. This is a critical gap for a destructive operation.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single short sentence, which is under-specified. It lacks necessary details for a destructive tool, making it inefficient rather than concise.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given the lack of annotations and output schema, the description is incomplete. It fails to cover behavioral expectations, return values, or usage context, which are essential for a delete operation.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 100% and the parameter description '要删除的文件或文件夹路径' is sufficient. The tool description adds no additional meaning beyond the schema, so baseline 3 is appropriate.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the verb 'delete' and resource 'file or folder', making the tool's purpose unambiguous. However, it does not explicitly differentiate from the sibling tool 'batch_delete_files', though the singular form implies single file deletion.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives like 'batch_delete_files' or 'move_file'. The description lacks any context about selection criteria, prerequisites, or exclusions.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/leemwood/filemanager-mcp-server'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server