Skip to main content
Glama
leehave

Claude Music MCP

by leehave

Server Configuration

Describes the environment variables required to run the server.

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault

No arguments

Instructions

Guidance the server publishes about itself, which clients place ahead of the tool catalog so the model reads it before choosing anything.

This server publishes no instructions, or was last inspected before Glama recorded them.

Capabilities

Server capabilities have not been inspected yet.

Tools

Functions exposed to the LLM to take actions

NameDescription
search_musicC

搜索音乐,支持按歌曲名、艺术家、专辑搜索

get_song_infoC

获取歌曲详细信息

create_playlistC

创建新的播放列表

add_to_playlistC

将歌曲添加到播放列表

get_playlistC

获取播放列表信息

list_playlistsC

列出所有播放列表

get_recommendationsC

根据用户喜好获取音乐推荐

Prompts

Interactive templates invoked by user choice

NameDescription

No prompts

Resources

Contextual data attached and managed by the client

NameDescription

No resources

TDQS

B3.3/5.0

Scored across 7 tools

Disambiguation5/5

Every tool has a clearly distinct purpose with no ambiguity. Tools like 'add_to_playlist', 'create_playlist', 'get_playlist', and 'list_playlists' each handle different aspects of playlist management, while 'search_music', 'get_song_info', and 'get_recommendations' cover distinct music discovery and information tasks. The descriptions reinforce these boundaries, making misselection unlikely.

Naming Consistency5/5

All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern using snake_case, such as 'add_to_playlist', 'create_playlist', 'get_playlist', 'get_recommendations', 'get_song_info', 'list_playlists', and 'search_music'. This predictable naming scheme enhances readability and usability, with no deviations in style or convention.

Tool Count5/5

With 7 tools, this server is well-scoped for a music management domain. The count is appropriate, covering core operations like playlist management, music search, and recommendations without being overwhelming. Each tool earns its place by addressing a specific need, aligning with typical server sizes of 3-15 tools.

Completeness4/5

The tool surface is largely complete for music management, covering key operations like creating, listing, and getting playlists, adding songs, searching music, and getting recommendations. A minor gap exists in update or delete operations for playlists or songs, which agents might need to work around, but core workflows are well-supported.

Maintenance

ActivityInactive
ResponsivenessNo issues