Skip to main content
Glama
leeguooooo

MCP Email Service

by leeguooooo
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
JavaScript
Hybrid

Related Servers

Alternatives to MCP Email Service

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • EmailMCP

      tuoc1226-maker
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables unified email management across Gmail, Outlook, iCloud, and IMAP providers with tools for search, send, organize, and batch operations via natural language.
      352 npm
      MIT

    • MCP Mail Organizer

      neomody77
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables comprehensive email management through IMAP/SMTP protocols with tools for searching, organizing, moving, flagging, and sending emails across various email providers. Features safe preview mode for destructive operations and supports multiple email providers including Gmail, Outlook, and Chinese email services.
      10 npm
      MIT

    • Universal Email MCP Server

      evamardin
      A
      license
      B
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI to send and receive emails via SMTP/IMAP, supporting auto-configuration for major email providers like QQ, 163, Gmail, Outlook, and enterprise mail.
      7
      687 npm
      2
      MIT

    • cpanel-mail-mcp

      rosauceda
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Manages email accounts via IMAP/SMTP, enabling reading, searching, sending, replying, forwarding, and folder management with multi-user and OAuth support.
      22
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    B3.4/5.0

    Scored across 29 tools

    Disambiguation3/5

    The tool set has clear functional distinctions for core email operations like sending, replying, and listing, but there is significant overlap in batch operations (e.g., delete_email, delete_emails, batch_delete_emails) and read/unread marking tools (mark_email_read, mark_email_unread, mark_emails, batch_mark_read), which could cause confusion. Descriptions help clarify some differences, but the boundaries are not always sharp.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Most tools follow a consistent verb_noun naming pattern (e.g., list_emails, send_email, search_emails), with clear and descriptive names. There are minor deviations like get_version and check_connection, which use 'get' and 'check' instead of more specific verbs, but overall the naming is predictable and readable across the set.

    Tool Count2/5

    With 29 tools, the count feels excessive for an email service, leading to redundancy and potential confusion. While email management can involve many operations, the set includes multiple tools for similar actions (e.g., three deletion tools), suggesting it could be streamlined without losing functionality, making it borderline heavy for the domain.

    Completeness5/5

    The tool set provides comprehensive coverage for email management, including CRUD operations (send, list, delete), synchronization (sync_emails), folder management (list_folders, move_emails_to_folder), contact analysis (analyze_contacts, get_contact_timeline), and health monitoring (get_sync_health, check_connection). There are no obvious gaps, and agents can handle full email workflows effectively.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessResponsive

    Resources