Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to pickfix-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Bridges UI feedback captured by a browser extension on localhost apps into a Claude Code session, queueing picked elements, comments and rewrite requests as batches that the coding agent can claim and act on. It also lets Claude report progress and per-item results back to the extension, and can import batches exported as JSON.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      MCP server that lets coding agents receive UI feedback from a browser overlay—clicked elements, selectors, source paths, and computed styles—and manage it with watch, ask, acknowledge, resolve, and dismiss tools.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables coding agents to capture pixel-accurate screenshots and DOM state from localhost apps, receive user-drawn instructions and reference images, and manage implementation review cycles.
      16 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables coding agents to pull structured UI feedback captured in the browser — including element selectors, bounding boxes, computed styles, screenshots, and annotations — and to mark issues as fixed.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables users to select UI elements on localhost pages and send fix requests to MCP-compatible coding agents, which retrieve the captures and edit the code, with masking of sensitive values.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Click an element in your running web app or the iOS Simulator and say what should change; your coding agent gets the comment with the selector, DOM path, computed styles, component chain, source-file hint and a cropped screenshot. Runs locally on 127.0.0.1.
      2
      MIT

    TDQS

    A4.1/5.0

    Scored across 5 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool maps to a distinct step in the feedback-batch lifecycle: status (session overview), list_batches (enumerate), claim_batch (acquire), report (close out), and import (ingest external). Status and list_batches both surface batch info, but one is session/connection health while the other enumerates batches, so boundaries stay clear.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All five tools use the same pickfix_ prefix followed by a clear verb or verb_noun (status, list_batches, claim_batch, report, import). The pattern is predictable and readable throughout.

    Tool Count5/5

    Five tools is well-scoped for a focused claim/work/report workflow, with each tool earning its place. No redundancy or filler.

    Completeness4/5

    The surface covers the core lifecycle: inspect session, list batches, claim, receive items, report outcome, plus importing external batches. A release/unclaim path (returning a claimed batch to the queue) is missing, which could be a dead end if a claim is abandoned, but agents can otherwise work around it.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues