Launch a business

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description discloses that the tool creates a live business (positioning, landing page, plan) and returns a public URL. It warns against multiple invocations. This goes beyond the basic safety annotations (readOnly=false, openWorld=true) by detailing the specific artifacts produced.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two sentences, front-loaded with the core action, then usage guidance. No redundancy.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The description covers the main purpose, key output (public URL), and next step (get_workspace). It lacks details on edge cases or side effects, but given the sibling tools and schema richness, it is sufficient.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema covers all three parameters with descriptions, so the baseline is 3. The tool description does not elaborate on parameter usage beyond the schema, though it reinforces that 'idea' is the core input.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states a specific action ('Turn an idea into a live business on Leapd') with clear deliverables (positioning, deployed landing page, day-one plan) and return value. It distinguishes itself from siblings by noting it launches a business and pointing to get_workspace for subsequent use.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Explicitly instructs 'Call this once — use get_workspace afterwards,' giving clear when-to-use and a next-step alternative. This distinguishes it from read-only tools like get_workspace/list_tasks.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.