Disco
# Disco
**Find novel, statistically validated patterns in tabular data** — feature interactions, subgroup effects, and conditional relationships that humans and agents miss.
[](https://pypi.org/project/discovery-engine-api/)
[](LICENSE)
Made by [Leap Laboratories](https://www.leap-labs.com).
---
## What it actually does
Most data analysis starts with a question. Disco starts with the data.
Without biases or assumptions, it finds combinations of feature conditions that significantly shift your target column — things like "patients aged 45–65 with low HDL *and* high CRP have 3× the readmission rate" — without you needing to hypothesise that interaction first.
Each pattern is:
- **Validated on a hold-out set** — increases the chance of generalisation
- **FDR-corrected** — p-values included, adjusted for multiple testing
- **Checked against academic literature** — to help you understand what you've found, and identify if it is novel.
The output is structured: conditions, effect sizes, p-values, citations, and a novelty classification for every pattern found.
**Use it when:** "which variables are most important with respect to X", "are there patterns we're missing?", "I don't know where to start with this data", "I need to understand how A and B affect C".
**Not for:** summary statistics, visualisation, filtering, SQL queries — use pandas for those
---
## Quickstart
```bash
pip install discovery-engine-api
```
Get an API key:
```bash
# Step 1: request verification code (no password, no card)
curl -X POST https://disco.leap-labs.com/api/signup \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{"email": "you@example.com"}'
# Step 2: submit code from email → get key
curl -X POST https://disco.leap-labs.com/api/signup/verify \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{"email": "you@example.com", "code": "123456"}'
# → {"key": "disco_...", "credits": 10, "tier": "free_tier"}
```
Or create a key at [disco.leap-labs.com/developers](https://disco.leap-labs.com/developers).
Run your first analysis:
```python
from discovery import Engine
engine = Engine(api_key="disco_...")
result = await engine.discover(
file="data.csv",
target_column="outcome",
)
for pattern in result.patterns:
if pattern.p_value < 0.05 and pattern.novelty_type == "novel":
print(f"{pattern.description} (p={pattern.p_value:.4f})")
print(f"Explore: {result.report_url}")
```
Runs take a few minutes. `discover()` polls automatically and logs progress — queue position, estimated wait, current pipeline step, and ETA. For background runs, see [Running asynchronously](#running-asynchronously).
→ [Full Python SDK reference](docs/python-sdk.md) · [Example notebook](notebooks/quickstart.ipynb)
---
## What you get back
Each `Pattern` in `result.patterns` looks like this (real output from a crop yield dataset):
```python
Pattern(
description="When humidity is between 72–89% AND wind speed is below 12 km/h, "
"crop yield increases by 34% above the dataset average",
conditions=[
{"type": "continuous", "feature": "humidity_pct",
"min_value": 72.0, "max_value": 89.0},
{"type": "continuous", "feature": "wind_speed_kmh",
"min_value": 0.0, "max_value": 12.0},
],
p_value=0.003, # FDR-corrected
novelty_type="novel",
novelty_explanation="Published studies examine humidity and wind speed as independent "
"predictors, but this interaction effect — where low wind amplifies "
"the benefit of high humidity within a specific range — has not been "
"reported in the literature.",
citations=[
{"title": "Effects of relative humidity on cereal crop productivity",
"authors": ["Zhang, L.", "Wang, H."], "year": "2021",
"journal": "Journal of Agricultural Science"},
],
target_change_direction="max",
abs_target_change=0.34, # 34% increase
support_count=847, # rows matching this pattern
support_percentage=16.9,
)
```
Key things to notice:
- **Patterns are combinations of conditions** — humidity AND wind speed together, not just "more humidity is better"
- **Specific thresholds** — 72–89%, not a vague correlation
- **Novel vs confirmatory** — every pattern is classified; confirmatory ones validate known science, novel ones are what you came for
- **Citations** — shows what IS known, so you can see what's genuinely new
- **`report_url`** links to an interactive web report with all patterns visualised
The `result.summary` gives an LLM-generated narrative overview:
```python
result.summary.overview
# "Disco identified 14 statistically significant patterns. 5 are novel.
# The strongest driver is a previously unreported interaction between humidity
# and wind speed at specific thresholds."
result.summary.key_insights
# ["Humidity × low wind speed at 72–89% humidity produces a 34% yield increase — novel.",
# "Soil nitrogen above 45 mg/kg shows diminishing returns when phosphorus is below 12 mg/kg.",
# ...]
```
---
## How it works
Disco is a pipeline, not prompt engineering over data. It:
1. Trains machine learning models on a subset of your data
2. Uses interpretability techniques to extract learned patterns
3. Validates every pattern on the held-out data with FDR correction (Benjamini-Hochberg)
4. Checks surviving patterns against academic literature via semantic search
You cannot replicate this by writing pandas code or asking an LLM to look at a CSV. It finds structure that hypothesis-driven analysis misses because it doesn't start with hypotheses.
---
## Preparing your data
Before running, exclude columns that would produce meaningless findings. Disco finds statistically real patterns — but if the input includes columns that are definitionally related to the target, the patterns will be tautological.
**Exclude:**
1. **Identifiers** — row IDs, UUIDs, patient IDs, sample codes
2. **Data leakage** — the target renamed or reformatted (e.g., `diagnosis_text` when the target is `diagnosis_code`)
3. **Tautological columns** — alternative encodings of the same construct as the target. If target is `serious`, then `serious_outcome`, `not_serious`, `death` are all part of the same classification. If target is `profit`, then `revenue` and `cost` together compose it. If target is a survey index, the sub-items are tautological.
> Full guidance with examples: [SKILL.md](SKILL.md#preparing-your-data)
---
## Parameters
```python
await engine.discover(
file="data.csv", # path, Path, or pd.DataFrame
target_column="outcome", # column to predict/explain
analysis_depth=2, # 2=default, higher=deeper analysis, lower = faster and cheaper
visibility="public", # "public" (always free, data and report is published) or "private" (costs credits)
column_descriptions={ # improves pattern explanations and literature context
"bmi": "Body mass index",
"hdl": "HDL cholesterol in mg/dL",
},
excluded_columns=["id", "timestamp"], # see "Preparing your data" above
use_llms=False, # Defaults to False. If True, runs are slower and more expensive, but you get smarter pre-processing, summary page, literature context and novelty assessment. Public runs always use LLMs.
title="My dataset",
description="...", # improves pattern explanations and literature context
)
```
> Public runs are free but results are published. Set `visibility="private"` for private data — this costs credits.
---
## Running asynchronously
Runs take a few minutes. For agent workflows or scripts that do other work in parallel:
```python
# Submit without waiting
run = await engine.run_async(file="data.csv", target_column="outcome", wait=False)
print(f"Submitted {run.run_id}, continuing...")
# ... do other things ...
result = await engine.wait_for_completion(run.run_id, timeout=1800)
```
For synchronous scripts and Jupyter notebooks:
```python
result = engine.run(file="data.csv", target_column="outcome", wait=True)
# or: pip install discovery-engine-api[jupyter] for notebook compatibility
```
---
## MCP server
Disco is available as an MCP server — no local install required.
```json
{
"mcpServers": {
"discovery-engine": {
"url": "https://disco.leap-labs.com/mcp",
"env": { "DISCOVERY_API_KEY": "disco_..." }
}
}
}
```
Tools: `discovery_list_plans`, `discovery_estimate`, `discovery_upload`, `discovery_analyze`, `discovery_status`, `discovery_get_results`, `discovery_account`, `discovery_signup`, `discovery_signup_verify`, `discovery_login`, `discovery_login_verify`, `discovery_add_payment_method`, `discovery_subscribe`, `discovery_purchase_credits`.
→ [Full agent skill file](SKILL.md)
---
## Pricing
| | Cost |
|---|---|
| Public runs | Free — results and data are published |
| Private runs | Credits vary by file size and configuration — use `engine.estimate()` |
| Free tier | 10 credits/month, no card required |
| Researcher | $49/month — 500 credits |
| Team | $199/month — 2000 credits |
| Credits | $0.10 per credit |
Estimate before running:
```python
estimate = await engine.estimate(file_size_mb=10.5, num_columns=25, analysis_depth=2, visibility="private")
# estimate["cost"]["credits"] → 55
# estimate["account"]["sufficient"] → True/False
```
Account management is fully programmatic — attach payment methods, subscribe to plans, and purchase credits via the SDK or REST API. See [Python SDK reference](docs/python-sdk.md#account-management) or [SKILL.md](SKILL.md#paying-for-credits-programmatic).
---
## Expected data format
Disco expects a **flat table** — columns for features, rows for samples.
```
| patient_id | age | bmi | smoker | outcome |
|------------|-----|------|--------|---------|
| 001 | 52 | 28.3 | yes | 1 |
| 002 | 34 | 22.1 | no | 0 |
| ... | ... | ... | ... | ... |
```
- **One row per observation** — a patient, a sample, a transaction, a measurement, etc.
- **One column per feature** — numeric, categorical, datetime, or free text are all fine
- **One target column** — the outcome you want to understand. Must have at least 2 distinct values.
- **Missing values are OK** — Disco handles them automatically. Don't drop rows or impute beforehand.
- **No pivoting needed** — if your data is already in a flat table, it's ready to go
**Supported formats:** CSV, TSV, Excel (.xlsx), JSON, Parquet, ARFF, Feather. Max 5 GB.
**Not supported:** images, raw text documents, nested/hierarchical JSON, multi-sheet Excel (use the first sheet or export to CSV)
---
## Compared to other tools
| Goal | Tool |
|---|---|
| Summary statistics, data quality | ydata-profiling, sweetviz |
| Predictive model | AutoML (auto-sklearn, TPOT, H2O) |
| Quick correlations | pandas, seaborn |
| Answer a specific question about data | ChatGPT, Claude |
| **Find what you don't know to look for** | **Disco** |
Disco isn't a replacement for EDA or AutoML — it finds the patterns those tools miss. We [tested 18 data analysis tools](https://www.leap-labs.com/research/the-patterns-that-agents-miss) on a dataset with known ground-truth patterns. Most confidently reported wrong results. Disco was the only one that found every pattern.
---
## Links
- [Dashboard](https://disco.leap-labs.com)
- [API keys](https://disco.leap-labs.com/developers)
- [Python SDK on PyPI](https://pypi.org/project/discovery-engine-api/)
- [Python SDK reference](docs/python-sdk.md)
- [OpenAPI spec](https://disco.leap-labs.com/.well-known/openapi.json)
- [Agent / MCP docs](SKILL.md)
- [LLM-friendly reference](llms.txt)
- [OpenAPI spec](https://disco.leap-labs.com/.well-known/openapi.json)
- [OpenAPI spec (in-repo)](docs/openapi.json)
- [Public reports gallery](https://disco.leap-labs.com/discover)
---
TDQS
Scored across 14 tools
Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose with no overlap. Account management (discovery_account, discovery_add_payment_method), authentication (discovery_login, discovery_login_verify, discovery_signup, discovery_signup_verify), analysis workflow (discovery_upload, discovery_estimate, discovery_analyze, discovery_status, discovery_get_results), and billing (discovery_list_plans, discovery_purchase_credits, discovery_subscribe) are all cleanly separated. An agent can easily distinguish between tools like discovery_analyze (run analysis) and discovery_estimate (check cost/time) despite both relating to analysis preparation.
All 14 tools follow a perfect 'discovery_verb_noun' pattern with consistent snake_case throughout. The naming convention is highly predictable: discovery_account, discovery_analyze, discovery_estimate, discovery_get_results, discovery_list_plans, etc. This consistency makes the tool set immediately understandable and navigable.
14 tools is ideal for this server's comprehensive scope covering authentication, data upload, analysis execution, results retrieval, and billing management. Each tool serves a specific, necessary function in the end-to-end workflow. The count is neither too thin (missing critical operations) nor bloated (no redundant tools), perfectly matching the domain of a sophisticated data analysis platform.
The tool surface provides complete coverage for the Disco platform's domain. It includes full authentication flow (signup/login with verification), account management, billing operations (plans, payments, credits), data upload, analysis estimation, execution, status monitoring, and results retrieval. There are no dead ends or gaps—every logical step in the workflow has a corresponding tool, creating a coherent end-to-end experience.