Read Design Comments from Canva Cloud

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint=true and openWorldHint=true, so safety and external-network behavior are covered. The description reinforces this by citing a GET-based Canva Connect API call, but adds nothing about pagination, result volume, permission/scope requirements, or what a review thread contains.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

A single front-loaded sentence that identifies the resource, the target system, and the API endpoint with no filler. It is dense and partly jargon-heavy (and written in Vietnamese only), but nothing is wasted.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With no output schema, the description is the only place to learn what a returned comment or review thread looks like, and it stays silent on return shape and pagination. For a simple two-parameter read tool with full schema coverage and read-only annotations, this is adequate but leaves real gaps.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so both parameters are documented in the schema, establishing the baseline of 3. The description only implicitly maps design_id into the URL path template and says nothing about the status filter ('all'/'open'/'resolved'), so it adds no meaning beyond the schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb and resource — querying comments and review threads for a Canva design — and even names the underlying endpoint (GET /v1/designs/{id}/comments). It is clearly a read operation, which distinguishes it from write-side siblings like canva_auto_fix_from_comment, though that distinction is implicit rather than stated.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The word 'trực tiếp' (directly) hints that this is the path for an immediate read against Canva Cloud, but there is no explicit when-to-use, when-not-to-use, or named alternative such as canva_auto_fix_from_comment or canva_get_design_info. The agent must infer the routing decision.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.