lucky_delete_web_service

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The annotations already declare destructiveHint=true and idempotentHint=true, so the core safety profile is covered. The description adds no behavioral context beyond repeating the deletion, such as irreversibility, cascading effects, key provenance, or response behavior.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single sentence with no filler. The action and resource are front-loaded, and every word contributes to the meaning.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a one-parameter tool with no output schema and strong annotations, the description plus annotations cover the essential invocation and safety expectations. Missing details like key source and return value are minor and inferable from sibling list/create tools.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

With schema description coverage at 0% and a single required 'key' parameter, the description needed to explain the parameter's meaning. 'By key' only restates the property name and does not clarify the key format, how to obtain it, or what values are valid.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states a specific action ('Delete') and resource ('Lucky web service'), with 'by key' clarifying the identifier used. This clearly distinguishes it from sibling delete tools for STUN rules, certificates, port forwards, and DDNS.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Usage is implied by the name and sibling grouping: an agent can infer it is for removing a Lucky web service. However, the description gives no explicit when-to-use guidance, no exclusions, and does not reference alternatives such as list or update tools.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.