Skip to main content
Glama
lchenter
by lchenter

Related Servers

Alternatives to wyea-workflow

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to request user decisions and send notifications via Discord when human intervention is required during autonomous tasks. It supports blocking questions with custom options, progress reporting, and persistent state for seamless remote task management.
      8
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables agents to pause and ask a human for a decision, then resume with the answer, via a self-hosted SQLite-backed MCP server with console or phone interfaces.
      1
      AGPL 3.0
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      An MCP server that enables AI agents to pause and request human approval or information via Slack, Telegram, or macOS dialogs before proceeding with actions.
      2
      15
      Apache 2.0
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      An MCP server that lets an AI coding agent pause on human-only tasks, request structured input via a form, and resume with the answer, all locally without cloud dependencies.
      -
    • -
      license
      B
      quality
      Not graded
      maintenance
      Enables AI-driven orchestration of GitHub development workflows including automated issue analysis, code generation, code review, and PR creation through multiple specialized agents. Integrates with GitHub Actions to automate the complete development process from issue to pull request.
      7
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      A host-local stdio MCP server that lets AI agents read and create tasks, comment, and run a full claim/heartbeat/release/complete lifecycle with automatic process identification, all through local-first actions that sync to a task workspace without exposing a GitHub token.
      MIT

    TDQS

    A3.7/5.0

    Scored across 9 tools

    Disambiguation3/5

    The baseline/seen polling model is spread across wyea_check, wyea_wait, wyea_snapshot, and wyea_ask, and mail sending appears in wyea_create_issue, wyea_notify, and wyea_ask, creating real overlap. Descriptions explicitly warn against calling some together (e.g. not calling wyea_notify after wyea_create_issue), which mitigates but does not eliminate misselection risk.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    All tools share a consistent wyea_ prefix with clear, mostly single-word verbs or short verb_noun names (wyea_create_issue). Minor deviation: some are nouns/short tokens (wyea_status, wyea_wait) while others are actions, but the pattern is still readable and predictable.

    Tool Count4/5

    Nine tools is a reasonable, well-scoped size for a comment/decision workflow. A few tools (wyea_ask vs wyea_wait/wyea_snapshot, wyea_notify vs wyea_create_issue) are somewhat redundant, so not every tool strictly earns its place.

    Completeness4/5

    The surface covers the lifecycle: status check, issue creation, commenting, notifying, waiting, baseline snapshots, and closing. Minor gaps exist (no update/edit or reopen, no issue listing/get), but core agent workflows are covered.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues