Skip to main content
Glama
lava

git-training-wheels

by lava
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to git-training-wheels

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • git-mcp-server

      saitolume
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      A local MCP server that provides a safe, explicit set of Git operations for version control tasks like status, diff, branching, staging, committing, fetching, merging, and pushing.
      13
      4 npm
      MIT

    • fs-git-mcp

      wojons
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A Git-enforced filesystem MCP server that integrates git with filesystem operations, enforcing commits on writes, providing reads with history, and supporting staged branching.
      MIT

    • git-mcp-server

      sndworldgh
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A secure, git-aware MCP server for working with local repositories, enabling file management, shell commands, and full git operations within allowed directories.
      99 npm
      1
      GPL 3.0

    • git-courer

      blak0p
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      An MCP server that gives AI agents a full, safe interface to Git with automatic backups, isolated worktrees, and structured JSON outputs.
      43
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A3.6/5.0

    Scored across 2 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    git_commit creates a new commit, while git_commit_amend modifies an existing commit (via amend or fixup). The purposes are clearly distinct and the descriptions explicitly define the boundary. No ambiguity exists between the two tools.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    Both tools follow the same `git_` prefix plus a verb (`commit`, `commit_amend`), creating a clear and predictable pattern. The naming is consistent and immediately conveys the action.

    Tool Count3/5

    With only two tools, the surface feels thin, even for a focused 'training wheels' server. While the tools are well-chosen for basic commit workflows, a couple more (e.g., log, status) would round out the set. It is borderline but not critically under-scoped.

    Completeness3/5

    The domain appears to be basic git commit operations, and the two tools cover creating and amending/fixing up commits. However, there are notable gaps such as inspecting commit history, checking repository status, or reverting changes, which an agent would likely need for a complete workflow.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources