Perform HTTP DELETE requests to remove resources from web servers using browser automation. Send DELETE operations to specified URLs through Playwright with Chrome DevTools Protocol integration.
Perform an HTTP DELETE request
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| url | Yes | URL to perform DELETE operation |
Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
With no annotations provided, the description carries full burden but only states the action without behavioral details. It doesn't disclose effects (e.g., data deletion, side effects), authentication needs, error handling, or response format, which are critical for a destructive operation like DELETE.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single, efficient sentence with zero waste, clearly front-loaded with the core action. It's appropriately sized for a simple tool, making it easy to parse quickly.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given the tool's complexity (HTTP DELETE is a destructive operation) and lack of annotations or output schema, the description is incomplete. It fails to address key aspects like what the tool returns, error conditions, or safety warnings, leaving significant gaps for agent understanding.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema description coverage is 100%, with the 'url' parameter documented in the schema. The description adds no additional meaning beyond what the schema provides, such as URL format examples or constraints, so it meets the baseline for high coverage without extra value.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the action ('Perform an HTTP DELETE request'), which is a specific verb. It distinguishes from siblings like playwright_post or playwright_put by specifying the HTTP method, but doesn't explicitly mention the resource being deleted (e.g., web content or API endpoint), keeping it slightly generic.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives is provided. It doesn't mention scenarios for DELETE requests (e.g., deleting resources in REST APIs) or differentiate from other HTTP methods in the sibling list, leaving usage context implied but unspecified.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.