clo3d-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to clo3d-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to control CLO3D for pattern creation, fabric swapping, simulation, and model export via natural language commands.36MIT
- AlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceEnables AI-assisted garment design by letting Claude (or any MCP host) drive CLO3D — import projects, dress avatars, assign fabrics, simulate cloth, render, and export, all from a chat.144MIT
- AlicenseBqualityAmaintenanceEnables controlling CLO3D from any MCP client to inspect projects, create and edit patterns, manage fabrics and colorways, run simulations, and export models through chat.104MIT
- AlicenseBqualityCmaintenanceConnects MCP-compatible AI agents to a local 3D garment design application through its Python API, enabling scene inspection, pattern and sewing operations, fabric/material management, simulation, mesh measurement, checkpoints, import/export, documentation search, and raw Python execution.42MIT
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceEnables AI-driven 3D modeling in Blender by providing tools to create primitives, apply modifiers and materials, set up lighting and cameras, capture viewport snapshots, export assets, inspect scenes, and execute Python commands via natural language.10MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to read, inspect, and manipulate OpenUSD 3D scenes, including scene graph traversal, property querying, mesh export, and variant switching.10MIT
TDQS
Scored across 48 tools
Most tools have clear resource/action separation (pattern_, snapshot_, avatar_, scene_, checkpoint_), but several overlapping pairs exist: clo_run_python vs clo_api_search vs clo_api_doc (all about understanding/executing CLO API), clo_status/launch/stop_bridge are distinct but 'garment_plan_preview/build/re_build' have empty descriptions, and garment_rebuild's purpose overlaps conceptually with pattern_edit_points/pattern_ops for modifying garments.
Mostly consistent 'verb_noun' snake_case (pattern_create, scene_open, avatar_list), but there are deviations: some use bare nouns (arrangement_points, scene_info, snapshot), some prefix with 'clo_' while others don't, and 'garment_plan_preview'/'garment_build' sit awkwardly next to 'clo_run_python' and 'sew'.
48 tools is heavy for an MCP server. While the domain (3D garment simulation) is broadath, the count approaches 50, which burdens agent tool-selection. Several tool families (clo_api_*, checkpoint_*, fabric_*, garment_*) could be consolidated or trimmed.
Core lifecycle is covered: scene management, pattern creation/editing, simulation, checkpoints, garment rebuilds, and avatar handling. However, notable gaps exist: no tool to delete a seam or unsew pieces, no fabric creation/management beyond listing and assignment, no animation/pose control for avatars, and garment_plan_preview/build appear to exist but have empty descriptions, leaving their capabilities unclear.