Skip to main content
Glama
lara-muhanna

MCP Airlock

by lara-muhanna

Related Servers

Alternatives to MCP Airlock

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables secure interaction between LLMs and MCP tools by applying zero-trust security controls, including sensitive data masking, file system protection, and policy enforcement.
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables production-hardened MCP tool serving with OAuth 2.1 audience-restricted tokens, purpose-bound tools, human-in-the-loop approvals, containment, and audit trails for AI agents.
      Apache 2.0
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables LLM agents to enforce security policies by authorizing tool calls, scanning for prompt injection, checking memory writes, redacting PII, and accessing audit trails through MCP.
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enforces fine-grained, context-aware access control on MCP tool calls, with a tamper-evident, replayable audit log that records denials and verifies every decision.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to securely discover, invoke, and manage tools through a hardened MCP endpoint with protections like injection detection, circuit breakers, retry backoff, response caching, context-window limiting, and state snapshots.
      1 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Governed MCP gateway that lets AI agents call tools with policy enforcement, prompt-injection screening, a kill-switch, and tamper-evident signed audit logs.
      Apache 2.0

    TDQS

    C2.9/5.0

    Scored across 4 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Each tool targets a distinct function (provenance auditing, capability issuance, generic HTTP fetching, and weather retrieval) with minimal overlap. An agent can easily distinguish when to use each based on the task requirements.

    Naming Consistency3/5

    Mixed naming patterns: two tools use 'airlock_' prefix with verbs (issue, audit_tail), while others use 'http_' prefix or no prefix (weather_hourly). The weather tool breaks the verb-first convention used by others, using a noun-adjective pattern instead.

    Tool Count3/5

    Four tools is acceptably compact but the set suffers from scope confusion, mixing core Airlock security functions with unrelated utility tools (weather, HTTP). This feels like two different servers merged together rather than a cohesive toolset.

    Completeness2/5

    The Airlock domain (capability management) is severely underdeveloped, offering only issuance and audit tail reading without revocation, validation, or capability listing. The utility tools (weather, HTTP) are also minimal, offering only hourly forecasts and GET requests without parameter customization.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues