get_job_detail

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are present. The description adds the behavioral note that users can apply through a URL in the response, which is helpful. However, it does not disclose other aspects like permissions, rate limits, or whether the operation is read-only.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is concise with two short sentences, no redundant information, and correctly focuses on purpose and a key behavioral detail. Could be slightly more structured but efficient.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple tool with 1 parameter and no output schema, the description covers the basic purpose and a notable response feature (apply URL). However, it lacks detail on what 'detailed information' comprises, leaving some ambiguity.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% for the single parameter 'jobId' with a basic description. The tool description does not add additional semantic meaning beyond 'specific job posting'; it simply restates the resource.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states 'Get detailed information about a specific job posting', using a specific verb and resource. It distinguishes from sibling tools like 'search_jobs' (general search) and 'get_job_summary' (summary vs detail).

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives such as 'search_jobs' for finding jobs or 'get_job_summary' for a shorter view. There are no preconditions or exclusions mentioned.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.