ttw-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to ttw-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceEnables querying table tennis ratings, players, tournaments, and halls from rttf.ru, with respect for robots.txt restrictions.5MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceEnables AI agents and terminal users to search players and tournaments, read tournament pages as structured data, and retrieve Austrian championship leagues without login. Also supports checking and, after confirmation, entering team match reports against club rosters and the public results site.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceRead-only MCP server that queries Russian Railways (ticket.rzd.ru) for train schedules, car types, prices, and seat availability. It provides official RZD links for manual booking but does not log in, book, or pay.31 npm2MIT
- AlicenseBqualityCmaintenanceProvides access to Chess.com player data, game records, and public information through standardized MCP interfaces, allowing AI assistants to search and analyze chess information.1090MIT
- MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceMCP server for reading Fonbet sports events and odds, enabling search for events, retrieval of odds, and value-bet checking via natural language.-
TDQS
Scored across 5 tools
Each tool has a clearly distinct role: search vs. detail for both tournaments and players, plus a dedicated head-to-head endpoint. There is no overlap or ambiguity between the two search tools and their corresponding getter tools.
All tool names follow the same snake_case verb_noun pattern: search_tournaments, get_tournament, search_players, get_player, get_head_to_head. The naming is uniform and predictable.
Five tools is well-scoped for a read-only tournament and player statistics server: two search endpoints, two detail endpoints, and one head-to-head endpoint. Each tool covers a distinct need without bloat.
The tool surface covers the core read-only domain: finding tournaments, inspecting tournament results, searching players, viewing detailed player histories, and comparing two players. Documented source limitations such as missing tournament match lists are explicitly handled via player profiles, so no critical workflow dead-ends.