Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to glm-vision-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables analysis of local images through Kimi (Moonshot AI) vision models via the MCP protocol, supporting features like OCR and long context understanding.
      220 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Provides a unified image-understanding tool for AI assistants without native vision, letting them analyze screenshots, error messages, UI layouts, and documents via multiple vision LLM providers. It supports local files, remote URLs, Data URIs, OCR, multi-crop processing, and standard MCP clients.
      1,104 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Grants image-understanding capabilities to AI coding assistants that lack native vision by routing screenshots, error messages, UI mockups and documents through a single unified analysis tool. Supports multiple vision model providers such as GLM, DeepSeek-OCR, Qwen-VL, Doubao and Hunyuan, with automatic multi-crop, compression and retry handling for text-dense images.
      1,104 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      A multi-model vision MCP server that gives image understanding to AI coding assistants lacking native vision, letting them analyze screenshots, error messages, UIs, and documents through a single image_understand tool. It routes requests to major vision LLM providers such as GLM, DeepSeek-OCR, Qwen-VL, Doubao, and Hunyuan, with automatic image preprocessing, cropping, and retries.
      1,104 npm
      MIT

    TDQS

    A3.9/5.0

    Scored across 1 tool

    Disambiguation5/5

    With only one tool, there is no possibility of selecting between overlapping tools. The tool's purpose is clearly described as image description and OCR, so no ambiguity exists.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    The single tool name 'describe_image' follows a clear verb_noun pattern, which is internally consistent. There are no other tools to create inconsistencies.

    Tool Count2/5

    The server offers only one tool, which feels too thin for a vision-focused server. Even though the domain is narrow, typical vision servers provide separate operations for description, OCR, and question answering, making a single catch-all tool insufficient.

    Completeness3/5

    The tool covers image description and text extraction, but lacks common vision capabilities such as answering questions about an image or analyzing multiple images. The combined single tool creates a limitation where specific tasks cannot be addressed independently.

    Maintenance

    ActivityStale
    ResponsivenessNo issues