Lanonasis MCP Server
OfficialRelated Servers
Alternatives to Lanonasis MCP Server
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- -licenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnterprise-grade MCP server for persistent, intelligent memory management across Claude Code sessions.-
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceA production-ready MCP server ecosystem providing Claude AI with 150+ specialized tools across enhanced memory, data analytics, security, design, and infrastructure domains with PostgreSQL, Redis, Qdrant, and Docker orchestration.-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnterprise-grade MCP server integrating Claude AI capabilities, enabling AI-powered conversations, file operations, and system tools via the Model Context Protocol.1Apache 2.0
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceAn MCP server that stores project memory in Supabase, allowing AI tools to persist context, notes, and decisions across sessions. Enables Claude Code, Codex, and similar assistants to maintain long-term project continuity through persistent memory storage.2MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceA production-ready MCP server with file management, HTTP requests, system info, and environment variable tools, plus a management UI and dual transport for Claude Desktop and Claude.ai.261 npmMIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceAn MCP server that gives Claude persistent memory by storing conversation context, entities, and enabling semantic search across sessions.21 npm1MIT
TDQS
Scored across 17 tools
Each tool targets a distinct resource and action. Memory tools clearly separate get (by ID), search (semantic), and list (paginated) operations, while API keys, projects, config, and status tools are uniquely scoped. No two tools overlap significantly.
All 17 tools follow a consistent verb_noun snake_case pattern, using plural nouns for list/search and singular for point operations. Verb choices are clear (create, get, update, delete, list, search, rotate, set). No mixing of conventions.
At 17, the tool count is slightly above the typical 3-15 range, but the breadth of domains (memories, API keys, projects, config, status) justifies the extra tools. It feels well-scoped for a general-purpose backend server.
Memory management is fully covered with CRUD plus search. API key lifecycle is also solid. However, project support only includes create and list—no get, update, or delete—leaving a notable gap in the project resource lifecycle.