Skip to main content
Glama
lanlan0811

tianshu-mcp

by lanlan0811
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
TypeScript
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to tianshu-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • tianshu-mcp

      lanlan0811
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables orchestrating external AI agents to execute development tasks with asynchronous management, automated acceptance verification, failure rework loops, and optional visual baseline validation.
      11
      14 npm
      Apache 2.0

    • AI CLI MCP Server

      kiranmaya
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to delegate complex coding tasks, refactorings, and automated code reviews to OpenAI Codex and Google Antigravity CLIs, running them autonomously in YOLO mode with process supervision.
      6
      MIT

    • multi-agent-bridge

      songzhifei512
      A
      license
      C
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables multiple CLI-based AI agents to collaborate as a coordinated team through shared task queues, shared memory, and a message bus, with DAG orchestration, rate-limit avoidance, parallel dispatching, and long-task management.
      63
      3
      MIT

    • Antigravity MCP Bridge

      Daniiislo
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables Codex or Claude Code to orchestrate persistent Antigravity CLI workers as independent implementers and testers within restricted workspace roots. It supports asynchronous task dispatch, progress polling, result inspection, follow-up messages, and cancellation with bounded, audited local event logging.
      249 npm
      4
      MIT

    • gemini2codex

      jiassia
      A
      license
      B
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables Codex to delegate frontend development, general implementation, and writing tasks to Gemini agents through task orchestration and dedicated writing tools, with opt-in file write and native tool permissions. Tasks are supervised across MCP disconnections, allowing progress polling, follow-ups, and explicit interruption.
      14
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    Context Every Agent Can ShareAgents share what they learn, hand off work, and keep it when you switch models. Start with 5 GB free.fulcradynamics.comAd

    TDQS

    A3.9/5.0

    Scored across 13 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Each tool maps to a distinct lifecycle action: dispatch (run_task), wait (wait_task/wait_any), inspect (query_task/get_task_report/list_tasks), resume (continue_task), rework (rework_task), cancel, verify, and baseline approval. The only mild overlap is among read-only status tools (query_task vs wait_task vs wait_any), but their blocking, snapshot, and group semantics are clearly described.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    All names use lower_snake_case with a verb-first pattern (get_task_report, list_tasks, run_task, verify_task, rework_task, etc.). wait_any is the only verb-only name that slightly breaks the verb_noun convention, but the set remains highly predictable.

    Tool Count5/5

    13 tools is well within the ideal 3-15 range and each tool corresponds to a real orchestration need: dispatch, polling/waiting, inspection, cancellation, recovery, verification, baseline approval, and adapter inspection. No tool feels redundant or out of scope.

    Completeness4/5

    The surface covers the full task lifecycle from run_task through wait/query/cancel/continue/rework/verify/report and includes visual-baseline prepare/approve plus profile inspection. Minor gaps exist, such as no reject/discard operation for a prepared visual baseline and no direct standalone plan-doc retrieval tool, but these are workable via existing meta outputs.

    Maintenance

    ActivityActive
    ResponsivenessResponsive

    Resources