Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to sysknife

Related Servers

  • A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    B
    maintenance
    Enables AI assistants to inspect and safely operate a Linux VPS through typed DevOps tools governed by YAML allowlists, read-only defaults, dry-run plans, secret redaction, and tamper-evident auditing.
    MIT
  • A
    license
    B
    quality
    B
    maintenance
    The safety gate between AI agents and your servers: 25 typed, policy-checked tools for services, logs, Docker, disk, ports and nginx, with human approval for changes and a hash-chained audit log.
    25
    1
    MIT
  • A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    C
    maintenance
    Enables AI clients to administer a Linux host through OAuth-secured, scope-controlled tools for diagnostics, filesystem and systemd operations, command execution, guarded networking, and managed project deployment with local owner approval.
    1
    MIT
  • A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    C
    maintenance
    Enables an OAuth-capable AI assistant to manage a self-hosted Linux server, starting with host-health and probe snapshots and optionally expanding to shell commands, bounded text-file reads/writes/moves, and asynchronous jobs through an owner-authenticated local broker. Configuration and credentials stay private on your own machine, with no hosted service or model API keys required.
    MIT
  • F
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    A
    maintenance
    Enables AI-controlled administration of remote Linux hosts and containers, including bounded shell execution, persistent PTY sessions, durable jobs/tasks, hardened filesystem access, process/service control, and resumable transfers.
    -
  • A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    D
    maintenance
    Enables AI agents to SSH into Linux servers, run commands, deploy code, and manage servers via natural language, also doubles as a CLI for manual use.
    3
    MIT

TDQS

B3.1/5.0

Scored across 58 tools

Disambiguation3/5

Most tools have tightly scoped, well-annotated purposes, but real overlaps exist: sysknife_list_installed_flatpaks and sysknife_ubuntu_list_flatpaks are near-identical, and the firewall family (get_firewall_state, get_firewall_backend_state, get_nftables_ruleset, ufw_status) plus the log family (collect_diagnostics, get_journal_log, get_service_logs) require careful reading to pick correctly. The plan/execute/doctor/audit_verify quartet is well separated by explicit cross-references.

Naming Consistency3/5

All tools share the sysknife_ prefix, but within that there are two competing conventions: noun-first read verbs (apt_history_list, app_armor_status, snap_list, ufw_status) mixed with verb-first names (get_disk_usage, list_users, get_firewall_state). A handful of top-level tools (plan, execute, doctor, history) break the pattern entirely, so an agent cannot reliably predict a name.

Tool Count2/5

58 tools is far beyond a comfortable surface for one server, and much of the bulk is per-domain read chatter (seven package-manager families, four container runtimes) that a generic plan/execute path could already reach. The count makes selection expensive and increases the chance of picking a near-duplicate.

Completeness4/5

Read coverage is genuinely broad across packages, services, networking, firewall, containers, and audit, and the plan/execute pair provides a generic mutation path so there are no dead ends. Gaps are narrower: no dedicated cron/scheduled-task detail beyond list_timers, no SELinux, and no per-service enable/disable tools outside the plan flow.

Maintenance

ActivityActive
ResponsivenessUsually handled