sysknife
Related Servers
Alternatives to sysknife
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceMCP servers for querying and submitting Ubuntu data via ubq, covering bugs, packages, versions, and merge requests with multiple authentication providers.51GPL 3.0
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to inspect and safely operate a Linux VPS through typed DevOps tools governed by YAML allowlists, read-only defaults, dry-run plans, secret redaction, and tamper-evident auditing.MIT
- AlicenseBqualityBmaintenanceThe safety gate between AI agents and your servers: 25 typed, policy-checked tools for services, logs, Docker, disk, ports and nginx, with human approval for changes and a hash-chained audit log.251MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables AI clients to administer a Linux host through OAuth-secured, scope-controlled tools for diagnostics, filesystem and systemd operations, command execution, guarded networking, and managed project deployment with local owner approval.1MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables an OAuth-capable AI assistant to manage a self-hosted Linux server, starting with host-health and probe snapshots and optionally expanding to shell commands, bounded text-file reads/writes/moves, and asynchronous jobs through an owner-authenticated local broker. Configuration and credentials stay private on your own machine, with no hosted service or model API keys required.MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceEnables AI-controlled administration of remote Linux hosts and containers, including bounded shell execution, persistent PTY sessions, durable jobs/tasks, hardened filesystem access, process/service control, and resumable transfers.-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables AI agents to SSH into Linux servers, run commands, deploy code, and manage servers via natural language, also doubles as a CLI for manual use.3MIT
TDQS
Scored across 58 tools
Most tools have tightly scoped, well-annotated purposes, but real overlaps exist: sysknife_list_installed_flatpaks and sysknife_ubuntu_list_flatpaks are near-identical, and the firewall family (get_firewall_state, get_firewall_backend_state, get_nftables_ruleset, ufw_status) plus the log family (collect_diagnostics, get_journal_log, get_service_logs) require careful reading to pick correctly. The plan/execute/doctor/audit_verify quartet is well separated by explicit cross-references.
All tools share the sysknife_ prefix, but within that there are two competing conventions: noun-first read verbs (apt_history_list, app_armor_status, snap_list, ufw_status) mixed with verb-first names (get_disk_usage, list_users, get_firewall_state). A handful of top-level tools (plan, execute, doctor, history) break the pattern entirely, so an agent cannot reliably predict a name.
58 tools is far beyond a comfortable surface for one server, and much of the bulk is per-domain read chatter (seven package-manager families, four container runtimes) that a generic plan/execute path could already reach. The count makes selection expensive and increases the chance of picking a near-duplicate.
Read coverage is genuinely broad across packages, services, networking, firewall, containers, and audit, and the plan/execute pair provides a generic mutation path so there are no dead ends. Gaps are narrower: no dedicated cron/scheduled-task detail beyond list_timers, no SELinux, and no per-service enable/disable tools outside the plan flow.