Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to LoreDocs

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Local-first, file-based memory layer for AI agents — one shared Markdown vault across Claude, Codex, Gemini, Cursor and any MCP client. Provides read/write memory tools with an audit trail, per-agent trust levels, and Git sync; no cloud and no lock-in.
      2
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Persistent memory layer for MCP-compatible AI agents. Implements save/recall/search over a local SQLite session store via 14 MCP tools. Auto-loads relevant context at session start. No cloud dependency. Works with Claude, Cursor, Codex, Hermes Agent. Free (50 sessions) / Pro ($8/mo).
      33
      364 PyPI
      10
      Business Source 1.1
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Local-first markdown vault with a built-in MCP server (streamable HTTP). 16 tools and 2 resources for Claude Code / Desktop / Cursor: read/write/search plus context_for_query, find_orphans, weekly_digest, compare_notes, semantic_outline. Per-folder agent permissions, LanceDB vectors, local Xenova ONNX embedder swappable to Ollama. Single Bun binary. AGPL.
      33
      AGPL 3.0
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to retain persistent, searchable memory and versioned vaults, spawn and recall named agents with state and audit history, run automations, monitors, and deep research, and execute on-chain and web tasks across sessions. It can be installed alongside Claude Code, Cursor, Windsurf, Zed, Hermes, and other MCP clients, with vault and memory optionally run entirely on the user's machine.
      45
      107 npm
      MIT

    TDQS

    A3.6/5.0

    Scored across 49 tools

    Disambiguation3/5

    Several clusters of tools have overlapping purposes: injection tools (vault_inject, vault_prime, vault_inject_by_tag, vault_inject_summary), status tools (vault_tier_status, get_license_tier, get_server_info, vault_get_server_capabilities), and session-link tools (vault_get_session_links vs vault_get_linked_sessions). Detailed descriptions generally differentiate them, but redundancy (e.g., vault_inject with no query is equivalent to vault_prime) creates a real misselection risk.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    The vast majority of tools follow a consistent vault_verb_noun pattern (vault_add_doc, vault_list_docs, vault_delete). Minor deviations include get_license_tier, get_server_info, and loredocs_onboard breaking the prefix pattern, and the session-link names being confusingly similar.

    Tool Count2/5

    49 tools is excessive for a document/vault management server. Many utilities are overly granular (vault_get_injection_cap, vault_estimate_tokens, vault_get_server_capabilities, get_server_info) and could be consolidated, burdening discovery and selection.

    Completeness4/5

    The surface covers core CRUD for vaults and documents, search, tagging, linking, import/export, injection, and tier management. Notable gaps include no permanent deletion API for individual documents (only soft delete) and no vault rename/update operation.

    Maintenance

    ActivityActive
    ResponsivenessNo issues