Skip to main content
Glama
labyrinth-analytics

LoreConvo

Official

Related Servers

Alternatives to LoreConvo

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Persistent memory for AI coding agents, storing decisions, bug fixes, conventions, and discoveries in a local SQLite database and automatically recalling them when relevant. Works with Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, Gemini CLI, and other MCP-compatible agents.
      22
      2
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Persistent memory for any AI assistant. Zero token cost until recall. Stores memories in local SQLite, ranks by 6-factor scoring, returns results 79% smaller than JSON. Works with Claude, ChatGPT, Grok, Cursor, Windsurf, and any MCP client.
      49
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables AI coding agents to maintain persistent, cross-session memory of codebase architecture, naming conventions, and decisions through MCP tools. Eliminates repetitive project re-explanation by automatically injecting stored context into every session with local-first SQLite storage and optional team sharing capabilities.
      4
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Persistent memory API for AI agents — store, recall, and inject semantically-searchable context across sessions. EU-hosted, GDPR-compliant. Supports Claude, Cursor, Cline, and any MCP-compatible client.
      4
      2
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Provides persistent, searchable memory for AI agents across any MCP-compatible client, storing project context, user preferences, and session learnings locally in SQLite with tools to save, retrieve, search, and manage them.
      12
      5 npm
      MIT

    TDQS

    A3.7/5.0

    Scored across 33 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools have distinct purposes, but there is some overlap between get_context_for and search_sessions, as both retrieve session content based on queries. However, the former focuses on 'prior decisions and context' while the latter is a general search, so they are mostly distinguishable.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tool names follow a consistent snake_case and verb_noun pattern (e.g., consolidate_memories, create_project, search_sessions). Even compound names like tag_as_anti_pattern and untag_anti_pattern are logically consistent. No mixing of camelCase or other conventions.

    Tool Count3/5

    With 33 tools, the set is quite large for a memory server. Each tool serves a distinct purpose, but the overall scope might be overwhelming. The number is borderline high compared to typical well-scoped servers (3-15 tools), though the domain is broad.

    Completeness4/5

    The tool surface covers most lifecycle operations for sessions, projects, memory, and anti-patterns. Notable gaps include no explicit delete session tool (though set_session_expiry and pin_session manage lifecycle) and no update project tool. Overall, the set is comprehensive with minor gaps.

    Maintenance

    ActivityActive
    ResponsivenessResponsive