Skip to main content
Glama
labrat-akhona

Semantix-verify

by labrat-akhona
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to Semantix-verify

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • openclaw-output-vetter-mcp

      temurkhan13
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      MCP server for verifying AI agent claims vs reality — single-transcript inline grounding-check that flags when an agent's response states facts not in the input context, when its code silently swallows exceptions and substitutes mock data, or when its multi-turn transcript contains contradictions or unverified completion claims. Sub-second, local, free, no API calls.
      4
      23 PyPI
      1
      MIT

    • tool-smith

      ganlin770
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      MCP server that routes natural language requests to structured tool calls using a LoRA-tuned small language model, with built-in validation, retry, and fallback recovery.
      MIT

    • one-mcp

      freakynit
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A lightweight MCP server that enables intelligent tool management and semantic search for APIs using sentence-transformers. It supports both REST and MCP interfaces across dual transport modes, allowing users to upload, manage, and query API tools with natural language.
      1
      MIT

    • Chiasmus

      yogthos
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      MCP server that gives LLMs access to formal verification via Z3 and SWI-Prolog, plus tree-sitter-based source code analysis. Translates natural language problems into formal logic using a template-based pipeline, verifies results with mathematical certainty, and analyzes call graphs for reachability, dead code, and impact analysis.
      72 npm
      213
      Apache 2.0
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A3.8/5.0

    Scored across 1 tool

    Disambiguation5/5

    With only one tool, there is no potential for confusion between tools. The single tool has a clearly distinct purpose.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    Only one tool exists, so naming consistency is not an issue. The tool name 'verify_text_intent' follows a clear verb_noun pattern.

    Tool Count3/5

    One tool is borderline appropriate for a focused verification utility. While minimal, it covers the core functionality without being trivial.

    Completeness4/5

    The tool effectively covers the primary task of text intent verification, including correction suggestions. Minor gaps exist (e.g., no batch verification or intent listing), but the set is complete for the stated purpose.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources