No user-submitted related servers found.
Scored across 16 tools
Each tool owns a distinct resource+action and every description explicitly disambiguates it from its nearest neighbours (e.g. 'use gulliver_fix for a single slow query', 'use gulliver_drift for schema changes, gulliver_diff for rows'). The potentially overlapping cluster of lint/fix/preflight/rehearse/run forms a strict, well-explained pipeline rather than competing tools, and diff/check/drift and impact/review/lint are likewise cleanly separated.
Every tool follows the same predictable gulliver_<single lowercase word> pattern with no camelCase, hyphenation or multi-word drift. Although the suffix is a topic word rather than a strict verb_noun pair, the convention is uniform and immediately readable across all 16 tools.
16 tools is slightly above the comfortable band but justified by an unusually broad domain (lint, rewrite, costing, execution, diffing, lineage, drift, translation, checks, workload and PR review). Each tool covers a genuinely different lifecycle stage, so none feels like filler, though a couple of pairs could conceivably be merged.
The SQL safety/cost lifecycle is covered end to end: inspect → lint → fix → preflight → rehearse → run → receipt, plus drift, diff, lineage, checks, incremental advice and PR review. Minor gaps remain: there is no tool to add/edit connections or budgets (status is read-only), no way to list recent receipts, and no explicit approval action even though runs can return needs_approval.