Skip to main content
Glama
l4b4r4b4b4
by l4b4r4b4b4

list_crypto_symbols

Retrieve a mapping of common crypto symbols to their CoinGecko IDs for use in portfolio creation. Get the number of supported symbols and usage instructions.

Instructions

List supported cryptocurrency symbols and their CoinGecko IDs.

Returns the mapping of common crypto symbols (like BTC, ETH) to their CoinGecko API identifiers.

Returns: Dictionary containing: - symbols: Dict mapping symbol to CoinGecko ID - count: Number of supported symbols - usage: How to use with create_portfolio

Example: result = list_crypto_symbols() print(f"Supported: {list(result['symbols'].keys())[:10]}...")

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault

No arguments

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault

No arguments

Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided; description discloses return format and example but doesn't explicitly state it's read-only or safe. Adequate but not rich.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness3/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Description includes docstring-style Returns and Example sections, which is slightly verbose. Could be more concise while retaining clarity.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Fully describes return value (symbols, count, usage), provides example, and integrates with create_portfolio. Output schema exists to cover details.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

No parameters in schema; coverage is 100%. Description adds no param info, but baseline for zero-param tools is 4. No need for further explanation.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Description clearly states the tool lists supported crypto symbols and CoinGecko IDs. It differentiates from siblings like search_crypto_coins and get_crypto_info.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines3/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Description implies use for getting symbols to use with create_portfolio via the 'usage' field, but lacks explicit when-to-use or when-not-to-use compared to alternatives.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/l4b4r4b4b4/portfolio-mcp'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server