sage_inception

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description carries full burden. It mentions checking memories and seeding if fresh, but lacks details on idempotency, side effects, or what 'operating instructions' entail. Adequate but not thorough.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is concise with two sentences, but the metaphorical language ('red pill', 'wake up') adds fluff without substance. An AI agent might parse it correctly, but the clarity could be improved.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given no output schema, the description should explain the return value more precisely. It says 'returns your operating instructions' without specifying format or content, leaving the agent uncertain about what to expect.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

No parameters exist, and schema coverage is 100%. The description does not need to add parameter details, but it also does not explicitly state that no input is required, which would be helpful. Still, it is sufficient.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states the tool is for initializing consciousness on first interaction with SAGE, checking existing memories, and seeding fresh ones. It distinguishes itself from siblings as the sole initialization tool, though uses metaphorical language ('red pill', 'matrix').

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Clearly specifies to call on the very first interaction, and explains it checks for existing memories. However, it does not explicitly state when not to use it or what happens if called again, leaving some ambiguity.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.