Skip to main content
Glama
Sign In
Web Explorer MCP

Web Explorer MCP

by l0kifs
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to Web Explorer MCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • SearXNG MCP Server

      benreichman
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables web search and content scraping from multiple engines via a local SearXNG instance, allowing AI assistants to retrieve and extract web content.
      1
      -

    • web-search-mcp

      LMilazzo
      F
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables private, free web searches through a self-hosted SearXNG instance, replacing default search tools without API keys, rate limits, or third-party tracking.
      1
      -

    • SearXNG MCP Server

      ngc-shj
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables web search, image search, and news search through a self-hosted SearXNG instance. Provides privacy-focused meta-search capabilities aggregating results from multiple search engines.
      3
      176 npm
      1
      MIT

    • mcp-searxng

      kassol
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to perform web searches and read URL content via a SearXNG instance.
      2
      13 npm
      MIT

    • WebFetch.MCP

      manooll
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables local LLMs to search the web and fetch clean content from URLs without API keys, using SearxNG and Mozilla Readability.
      2
      42
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A4.2/5.0

    Scored across 2 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    The two tools have completely distinct purposes: one performs web searches and the other extracts content from a given URL. There is no overlap or ambiguity between them.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    Both tool names follow a consistent pattern: a descriptive noun phrase followed by '_tool' (web_search_tool, webpage_content_tool). This makes the naming predictable and clear.

    Tool Count3/5

    With only 2 tools, the server feels minimal for a 'Web Explorer' purpose. While the two tools cover search and content retrieval, the count is borderline and could benefit from additional tools like link extraction or history management.

    Completeness4/5

    The tool set covers the core web exploration workflow: searching and fetching content. It lacks some advanced operations like extracting specific elements or managing browsing sessions, but the primary needs are met without major gaps.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo recent community issues

    Resources