Skip to main content
Glama
kzmx23

Yandex Tracker MCP Server

by kzmx23

Related Servers

Alternatives to Yandex Tracker MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      C
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to work with Yandex Tracker through its API, letting them search, create, edit, close, and bulk-manage issues, comments, checklists, time entries, attachments, queues, boards, dashboards, projects, and automation workflows. It also supports read-only mode for safe viewing integrations.
      187
      45 npm
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables interaction with Yandex Tracker through its API for managing tasks, comments, and attachments. It supports issue searching, status transitions, and metadata retrieval for automated project management.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to read and manage issues, comments, checklists, worklogs, queues, users, metadata, and time reports through the Yandex Tracker REST API v3, requiring user confirmation before data-changing operations.
      30
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to interact with Yandex.Tracker task management system through MCP protocol. Supports creating and managing issues, searching tasks, handling comments, managing projects and queues, and generating analytics reports.
      ISC
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to securely interact with Yandex Tracker, covering queues, issues, comments, worklogs, checklists, boards, sprints, attachments, and advanced query-language search. Supports OAuth 2.0 or static token authentication, optional Redis caching, and stdio, SSE, or HTTP transports.
      Apache 2.0

    TDQS

    A3.7/5.0

    Scored across 56 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools are clearly separated by resource (issue, queue, component, board, user, comment, worklog, checklist) and action (get, create, update, delete, add, find). Some potential confusion exists between queue_get_components and component_get, or between issue_get and issues_find, but descriptions clarify the distinction well.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    The naming pattern is mostly consistent: resource_action (e.g., issue_get, issue_create, component_delete, queue_get_versions). Minor deviations exist: issues_find and issues_count use plural resource, and issue_templates_get_all vs issue_template_get are slightly inconsistent, but overall the pattern is predictable.

    Tool Count3/5

    56 tools is a large surface for a single MCP server, but Yandex Tracker is a broad platform covering issues, queues, components, boards, sprints, users, comments, worklogs, checklists, templates, and metadata. The count is heavy but each tool maps to a distinct operation; still, it exceeds the typical well-scoped range.

    Completeness5/5

    The tool set provides comprehensive CRUD and lifecycle coverage for issues, comments, worklogs, checklist items, components, and links, plus metadata discovery (fields, statuses, priorities, resolutions, templates, users, boards, sprints). The only minor gap is lack of direct issue deletion or board/queue creation, but those are rarely needed and the surface is otherwise complete.

    Maintenance

    ActivityActive
    ResponsivenessNo issues