semver-checks

pino 10.4.0, a minor release, added export { pino as default, pino } inside its pino namespace. That turns off implicit export for 9 members of the namespace, so const t: pino.TimeFn = () => '' compiles against 10.3.1 and fails against 10.4.0 with TS2694, "Namespace 'pino' has no exported member 'TimeFn'".

npx semver-checks compare pino@10.3.1 pino@10.4.0

Run with no arguments in a publishable package directory, npx semver-checks compares <name>@latest against .. This default is CLI-only: the GitHub Action and the MCP semver_compare tool need old explicitly.

semver-checks — Recommended bump: MAJOR
  major: 20 (confident: 11, review: 9)  minor: 88  patch: 0

  Breaking Changes — confident (MAJOR)
  ✗ Export 'TimeFn' was removed
      was: type-alias
  ✗ Export 'MixinFn' was removed
      was: type-alias
  ✗ Export 'MixinMergeStrategyFn' was removed
      was: type-alias
  ...

The output is trimmed to the bump counts and three of the 9 removed exports (... marks the cut, and stderr warnings are omitted); the full run also lists the other six, two required properties added to MultiStreamRes, the review-only findings and the additions.

semver-checks compares the TypeScript declarations on both sides and recommends the bump the type changes require, so the answer comes from the API rather than from the commit message. Neither side needs a checkout: each can be an npm spec, a git ref, or the working tree.

npx semver-checks compare your-package@latest .

The same check as a pull request gate, which annotates the changed lines and fails on a proven break:

# .github/workflows/semver-check.yml
on: pull_request
jobs:
  semver-checks:
    runs-on: ubuntu-latest
    steps:
      - uses: actions/checkout@v4
      - uses: actions/setup-node@v4
        with:
          node-version: "22"
      - run: npm ci
      - uses: kyungseopk1m/semver-checks@v0.15.2
        with:
          old: "your-package@latest"
          strict: "true"

Every input, and the release-pull-request variant that grades the declared bump and posts the verdict as a comment, are under GitHub Action.

• Why semver-checks?

• Quick Start

• CI Integration

• Accuracy

• Programmatic API

• Reference

• FAQ

Why semver-checks?

A bump is a claim about what a release did to its public API, and it is usually written by hand, from memory, at the end of the work. A refactor that drops a required export reads as a patch to the person who wrote it and as a broken build to everyone downstream.

Release tooling can only act on the evidence it is given. semantic-release derives the release type from commit conventions, and changesets records an author-written release note with the bump declared in its frontmatter. Both inherit whatever the author believed at the time.

semver-checks reads the public API directly using ts-morph and decides the bump from what the type signatures did.

The example above is not constructed. Run the tool across real releases and it finds breaking type changes that shipped as minors and patches. It is most dependable on structural changes, which is to say removed or renamed exports, narrowed signatures, and added required parameters and properties. Equivalence-preserving type rewrites are a known weak spot it can over-report, and docs/accuracy.md says exactly where to trust it and where not to.

// v1.0.0
export interface Config {
  host: string;
  port: number;
}

// Developer writes: "fix: add missing timeout config"
// Published as patch — but this is a MAJOR change:
export interface Config {
  host: string;
  port: number;
  timeout: number;
}
//                                                    ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ required-property-added

// v1.0.0
export function findUser(id: string): User;

// Developer writes: "fix: findUser can come up empty"
// Published as minor — but no existing consumer is written to handle null:
export function findUser(id: string): User | null;
//                                    ^^^^^^^^^^^ return-type-changed (MAJOR)

The reverse of that change is not a break: narrowing User | null down to User hands every consumer a value they were already prepared for, and semver-checks reports it as return-type-narrowed, a MINOR.

semver-checks is complementary to your existing release workflow. Use it as a verification step before publishing — it tells you whether your intended bump is safe, or whether you're about to ship a breaking change by accident.

Related MCP server: vdiff

Quick Start

npm install --save-dev semver-checks

Compare a git tag to the latest commit:

npx semver-checks compare v1.0.0 HEAD

Compare the published npm release against your working tree — answers "is my current change a breaking release?" without needing git tags:

npx semver-checks compare your-package@latest

A <package>@<version> argument is fetched from the npm registry (via npm pack) and used as the old version. Concrete versions, ranges, and common dist-tags are auto-detected (your-package@1.2.3, your-package@^1, your-package@next). For an uncommon dist-tag, make the intent explicit with the npm: prefix or --old-as npm (npm:your-package@my-custom-tag) so it isn't mistaken for a git ref.

Compare two local directories:

npx semver-checks compare ./old ./new

Existing relative paths without a ./ prefix are also treated as local directories:

npx semver-checks compare packages/core packages/core-next

If a git ref collides with an existing path name, force ref interpretation explicitly:

npx semver-checks compare main HEAD --old-as ref

Output as JSON, Markdown (for PR comments), or GitHub Actions annotations:

npx semver-checks compare v1.0.0 HEAD --format json
npx semver-checks compare v1.0.0 HEAD --format markdown
npx semver-checks compare v1.0.0 HEAD --format github

Fail in CI if breaking changes are detected (exit 1):

npx semver-checks compare v1.0.0 HEAD --strict

Inspect the API surface of the current or a past version:

npx semver-checks snapshot
npx semver-checks snapshot --ref v1.0.0
npx semver-checks snapshot --npm p-limit@6.1.0

Every flag is in docs/cli.md.

Multiple entry points

When package.json declares an "exports" map with several subpaths, every subpath with a declared .d.ts entry is extracted and compared independently. Adding a subpath is a MINOR change and removing one is MAJOR; a change inside a subpath is reported with a # separator (e.g. ./utils#helper). No flags are needed — the map is auto-detected.

For projects without an "exports" map, pass multiple entries explicitly by repeating --entry or comma-separating them:

npx semver-checks compare v1.0.0 HEAD --entry src/index.ts --entry src/utils.ts
npx semver-checks compare v1.0.0 HEAD --entry src/index.ts,src/utils.ts

Example output

semver-checks — Recommended bump: MAJOR
  major: 2 (confident: 1, review: 1)  minor: 1  patch: 0

  Breaking Changes — confident (MAJOR)
  ✗ Required property 'timeout' was added to interface 'Config'
      now: number

  Needs review — couldn't prove safe (MAJOR)
  ? Call signatures of interface 'Middleware' changed
      before: (req: string) => void
      after:  (request: string, next?: (() => void) | undefined) => void

  New Features (MINOR)
  + Export 'createConfig' was added

The second finding is a renamed parameter and an added optional one, which oblige nobody — but call signatures are compared as printed text, so the tool cannot prove that and says so instead of guessing. --strict exits 1 on the confident break only; the review-only item passes the gate unless you opt into --strict-review.

CI Integration

GitHub Action

semver-checks ships a reusable composite action. The most ergonomic setup compares the published latest release against the PR's working tree, so it needs no git tags and posts inline annotations on the diff:

name: SemVer Check

on:
  pull_request:
    branches: [main]

jobs:
  semver-checks:
    runs-on: ubuntu-latest
    steps:
      - uses: actions/checkout@v4
      - uses: actions/setup-node@v4
        with:
          node-version: "22"
      - run: npm ci

      - uses: kyungseopk1m/semver-checks@v0.15.2
        with:
          old: "your-package@latest" # the published version to compare against
          format: "github" # inline ::error:: / ::warning:: annotations
          strict: "true" # fail the PR on a confident (proven) breaking change

A full example lives in examples/github-actions.yml.

On a release pull request

Does the bump this release declares cover what its API surface did? @clerk/break-check and semvet also score the declared bump from the two package.json versions; reading it from .changeset files is what is specific here. declared: auto reads the bump from .changeset/*.md and falls back to the two package.json versions, and comment: true puts the verdict on the pull request instead of leaving it in the log.

permissions:
  contents: read
  pull-requests: write # required for `comment`

jobs:
  semver-checks:
    runs-on: ubuntu-latest
    steps:
      - uses: actions/checkout@v4
      - uses: actions/setup-node@v4
        with:
          node-version: "22"
      - run: npm ci

      - uses: kyungseopk1m/semver-checks@v0.15.2
        with:
          old: "your-package@latest"
          declared: "auto"
          comment: "true"

The step fails when the declaration understates a proven break, and passes with a note when it only understates an addition. token defaults to github.token; pass it explicitly if your setup needs a different one. A pull request from a fork gets a read-only token, so the comment is skipped with a warning there rather than failing the step.

The comment is posted with gh pr comment --edit-last --create-if-none, which updates the token owner's most recent comment on the pull request. It does not look for a marker of its own, so if the same token posts other comments from other workflows, run this one under its own token or leave comment off.

Without the action

Run the CLI directly — for example, compare the published release to the working tree:

- name: Check for breaking changes
  run: npx semver-checks compare your-package@latest --format github --strict

Or compare against a git tag:

- name: Check for breaking changes
  run: npx semver-checks compare v$(node -p "require('./package.json').version") HEAD --strict

Accuracy

Every breaking change carries a confidence. proven means the change is its own evidence, or a type relation the analyzer resolved and found genuinely unrelated; --strict fails on those and only those. heuristic means a conservative MAJOR it could not prove — surfaced for review, off the default gate, unless you opt into --strict-review.

The scorecard uses tsc as its oracle rather than the author's published bump, because the tool exists on the premise that authors get that bump wrong. 111 adjacent minor/patch release pairs across 24 packages, each with a consumer program compiled against both sides:

A name-and-arity baseline with no type resolution scores 87.5% / 32.6% on the same corpus. Leave --strict on for every push, and run --strict-review where a person reads the output before it ships.

docs/accuracy.md has the rest: how the corpus was built, the 7 pairs --strict stays quiet on and why each one, the single remaining false positive, what the variance probe refuses to answer, and the ten known limitations.

Programmatic API

import { compare, extract } from "semver-checks";

const report = await compare({
  oldSource: { type: "git", ref: "v1.0.0" },
  newSource: { type: "path", path: "." },
});

console.log(report.recommended); // 'major' | 'minor' | 'patch'
console.log(report.changes); // ApiChange[]
console.log(report.summary); // { major: 2, minor: 1, patch: 0, ... }

interface CompareOptions {
  oldSource: SourceRef;
  newSource: SourceRef;
  entry?: string | string[]; // Optional: specify one or more entry points
  installDeps?: boolean; // Optional: install deps on both sides before analyzing
  declared?: DeclaredBump | "auto"; // Optional: grade the bump this release declares
}

type DeclaredBump = "major" | "minor" | "patch" | "none";

type SourceRef =
  | { type: "path"; path: string }
  | { type: "git"; ref: string; cwd?: string }
  | { type: "npm"; spec: string }; // e.g. { type: 'npm', spec: 'p-limit@6.1.0' }

interface SemverReport {
  recommended: "major" | "minor" | "patch";
  changes: ApiChange[];
  summary: {
    major: number;
    minor: number;
    patch: number;
    majorProven: number;
    majorReview: number;
  };
  // Present only when a declared bump was supplied or detected.
  declaration?: BumpDeclaration;
}

interface BumpDeclaration {
  declared: DeclaredBump;
  source: string; // where it was read from: a changeset path, or the two versions
  required: "major" | "minor" | "patch"; // what the proven breaks require
  suggested: "major" | "minor" | "patch"; // what the whole change set argues for
  verdict: "ok" | "review" | "mismatch";
}

interface ApiChange {
  kind: ChangeKind;
  severity: "major" | "minor" | "patch";
  symbolPath: string;
  message: string;
  oldValue?: string;
  newValue?: string;
  confidence?: "proven" | "heuristic";
}

You can also extract a snapshot independently:

import { extract } from "semver-checks";

const snapshot = await extract({ projectPath: "." });
// Snapshots are keyed by export subpath ('.' is the root entry; additional
// subpaths come from the package.json "exports" map).
console.log(Object.keys(snapshot.entrypoints["."])); // root entry's symbol names

Reference

MCP server

semver-checks ships as a Model Context Protocol server, so an agent can call it as a tool:

claude mcp add semver-checks -- npx -y semver-checks --mcp

Two tools: semver_compare and semver_snapshot. Setup for other clients and the full argument schemas are in docs/mcp.md.

Comparison with Other Tools

semver-checks is a verification layer, not a release tool. Use it alongside semantic-release or changesets to check whether the declared bump matches the API changes.

How it differs

ts-semver-checks, @clerk/break-check and semvet each compare a local build against a baseline. ts-semver-checks and semvet use compiler assignability; ts-semver-checks takes the bump you expect through --expect and has no Action or MCP server, while semvet scores the declared bump from package.json. @clerk/break-check diffs API Extractor snapshots, adds an LLM review pass, scores the declared bump from package.json, and handles multi-package monorepos.

semver-checks can compare two published npm releases directly (compare pkg@x pkg@y), reads the declared bump from .changeset files, ships an MCP server, and publishes its accuracy numbers in docs/accuracy.md.

How It Works

1. Extract: Parse old and new TypeScript source files using ts-morph, building a typed API snapshot (functions, interfaces, enums, classes, type aliases, variables, namespaces)

2. Diff: Compare the two snapshots symbol by symbol — detect additions, removals, and signature changes

3. Classify: Assign each diff a major, minor, or patch severity

4. Report: Return a structured SemverReport with the recommended bump and per-change details

For git ref comparisons, the ref is extracted to a temporary directory via git archive, dependencies are installed there, and the directory is cleaned up afterwards. For npm specs, the published tarball is downloaded with npm pack and extracted to a temporary directory, with no dependency install, because the tarball already bundles its build output. Local path comparisons install nothing by default. --install-deps (or installDeps: true) overrides that and runs the install on both sides whatever their source kind — it is there for the local-path case, which is the only one that needs it.

FAQ

Will semver-checks catch every semver violation?

No. It catches API surface changes that are mechanically detectable from TypeScript's static type system: removed exports, signature changes, type changes, optionality changes, and similar structural changes. It does not detect behavioral changes, documentation changes, or changes hidden behind conditional compilation. When a package ships distinct ESM and CJS declaration files for the same entry point (for example, divergent import.types and require.types), only one surface is analyzed, so a break confined to the other surface can be missed. See docs/accuracy.md.

Does it have false positives?

Yes. It errs toward over-reporting MAJOR rather than missing a break, but the default CI gate only fails on proven breaks. Parameter and return type changes go through a structural assignability check, so widened parameters, narrowed returns, and equivalent rewrites such as readonly T[] vs ReadonlyArray<T> avoid false majors. Type aliases and variables still have conservative cases because they are compared as normalized serialized text first, and the probe upgrades that to a resolved relation only where it can. The concrete patterns are listed under Known limitations.

Does it support default exports?

Yes. A default export is extracted under the symbol name default and compared like the corresponding function, class, or value declaration.

Can I compare against a published npm version?

Yes. Pass a <package>@<version> spec and semver-checks downloads that release from the registry with npm pack, extracts the tarball, and analyzes its bundled .d.ts declarations:

npx semver-checks compare your-package@latest          # published latest vs working tree
npx semver-checks compare your-package@1.0.0 your-package@2.0.0  # two published releases

Because a published tarball ships compiled .d.ts files while your working tree ships .ts source, type representation can differ slightly between the two sides (TypeScript materializes some inferred types in declarations). Removals, additions, and signature changes are detected reliably; a handful of equivalent-but-reworded types may show up as a noisy diff. Comparing two published releases (.d.ts vs .d.ts) avoids that asymmetry.

Can I use it without a tsconfig.json?

Not for local-path or git-ref inputs: those are opened as a TypeScript project and need a tsconfig.json at the project root, or at the root inferred from the exports field in package.json. Published npm inputs are different — a permissive config is synthesized when the tarball does not ship one.

What happens if the analyzed project has TypeScript errors?

semver-checks will print a warning to stderr listing up to 5 errors and continue. Results may be incomplete if type errors affect the API surface. Set SEMVER_CHECKS_VERBOSE=1 for full diagnostics.

How is the entry point determined?

semver-checks looks for the entry file in this order:

1. The --entry flag if provided

2. The declaration under exports['.'] in package.json — every condition is walked (types, require/import/node/browser/module/default, nested, and fallback arrays), and .d.ts/.d.mts/.d.cts are all accepted. A bare-string "exports": "./index.js" or a flat conditions object "exports": { "types": "./index.d.ts", "default": "./index.js" } (no . subpath key) is treated as the . entry, so its types condition is read; for a published package, a .js target is also checked for a sibling declaration of the same name. A subpath-only map with no . key is left without a root entry (no fabricated root)

3. The top-level types or typings field in package.json

4. src/index.ts, then index.ts, then a conventional root index.d.ts/.d.mts/.d.cts as fallbacks

If none of these resolve, pass --entry explicitly.

When a project ships an "exports" map with several subpaths, each subpath is resolved and compared independently (see Multiple entry points).

Does it work with monorepos?

Yes. Point --entry at the package's entry file, or run the CLI from that package's directory. A monorepo tag shaped like pkg@1.2.3 reads as an npm spec to auto-detection, so pass --old-as ref for those.

Requirements

• Node.js ^20.0.0 || >=22.0.0 (Node 21 is excluded by a transitive dependency and is itself end of life)

• For local path / git-ref inputs: a tsconfig.json and TypeScript source files (.ts/.tsx) in the analyzed project

• For npm specs: nothing extra — the tarball's bundled .d.ts declarations are analyzed, and a tsconfig.json is synthesized if absent

Dual module support

semver-checks ships both CommonJS and ES module builds:

// ESM
import { compare } from "semver-checks";

// CJS
const { compare } = require("semver-checks");

Contributing

Contributions are welcome. Please read CONTRIBUTING.md before submitting a pull request.

License

MIT. See LICENSE.

Author

Kyungseop Kim — @kyungseopk1m