Blast Radius MCP
Server Configuration
Describes the environment variables required to run the server.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Instructions
Guidance the server publishes about itself, which clients place ahead of the tool catalog so the model reads it before choosing anything.
This server publishes no instructions, or was last inspected before Glama recorded them.
Capabilities
Features and capabilities supported by this server
Protocol revision2025-11-25
| Capability | Details |
|---|---|
| tools | {
"listChanged": true
} |
Tools
Functions exposed to the LLM to take actions
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
| dependency_blast_radiusC | Analyzes dependency blast radius using reverse BFS. |
| dependency_upgrade_analysisC | Simulates dependency upgrade impact. |
| security_audit_graphC | Runs OSV vulnerability analysis and attack path mapping. |
| open_dependency_visualizerD | Launches 3D dependency security galaxy. |
Prompts
Interactive templates invoked by user choice
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
No prompts | |
Resources
Contextual data attached and managed by the client
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
No resources | |
TDQS
Scored across 4 tools
Each tool has a distinct focus: blast radius analysis, upgrade impact simulation, security auditing, and visualization. However, dependency_blast_radius and dependency_upgrade_analysis both deal with impact analysis, which could cause mild confusion without careful description reading.
All names use snake_case, but the pattern is inconsistent: three are noun phrases (dependency_blast_radius, dependency_upgrade_analysis, security_audit_graph) while one is a verb phrase (open_dependency_visualizer). The 'dependency' prefix is repeated, but the lack of a uniform verb_noun structure reduces predictability.
With only 4 tools, the server is tightly scoped to its stated purpose of dependency and security analysis. Each tool covers a distinct aspect, and the count feels appropriate rather than thin or bloated.
The server covers core analysis, upgrade simulation, security auditing, and visualization, which covers the main workflows for dependency blast radius. Minor gaps exist, such as missing a simple dependency graph listing or direct comparison tools, but these are not critical for the domain.