No user-submitted related servers found.
Scored across 8 tools
Each tool targets a distinct operation: status for health, record/correct/retract for the three fact-mutation paths, get_entity for reads, list_changes for auditing, undo_changes for reversal, and save_checkpoint for snapshots. The record/correct/retract trio is cleanly separated by intent (new value vs. replacement vs. no replacement), so there is no realistic misselection risk.
Most tools follow a clear verb_noun pattern (record_fact, correct_fact, retract_fact, get_entity, list_changes, undo_changes, save_checkpoint). The lone outlier is 'status,' a bare noun, but the deviation is minor and does not impair readability.
Eight tools map neatly onto the fact-store lifecycle with no redundant or filler entries. The count is well within the ideal range for a focused append-only fact/audit service.
The surface covers the full fact lifecycle (record, correct, retract), reading current state, auditing changes, bulk undo, checkpointing, and health. The only soft gap is the absence of a way to list or restore named checkpoints explicitly, which agents can largely work around by re-saving by name.
