Skip to main content
Glama
kyle-marks

ask-pb

by kyle-marks

Related Servers

Alternatives to ask-pb

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • F
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Provides read-only MCP tools to search and retrieve evidence-grounded knowledge compiled from video content, including hybrid semantic and lexical search with citations.
      5
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables retrieval-augmented question answering over a private podcast archive with hybrid search (BM25 + dense embeddings), returning ranked passages with timestamps and citations.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables local read-only search and retrieval of approved, current evidence via hybrid lexical and dense methods, with tools to get exact source spans, answer from cited passages, and create and verify recheckable evidence packets.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to search millions of podcasts, read and search episode transcripts with timestamps and speakers, and access chapters, soundbites, Podcasting 2.0 tags, value-for-value data, feed health, and index statistics through 36 tools.
      36
      18 npm
      1
      MIT
    • F
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables searching and retrieving transcripts from over 280 episodes of Lenny's Podcast to access expert product and growth insights. It allows users to query by topic, list available episodes, and fetch full interview transcripts directly through Claude.
      3
      35
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables semantic search and grounded answering over customer-research interviews, with every answer traceable to source quotes.
      MIT

    TDQS

    A4.1/5.0

    Scored across 5 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool targets a distinct step in the workflow: searching transcripts, retrieving evidence details, listing episodes, checking coverage, and reading passages. No two tools appear to serve the same purpose; descriptions clearly differentiate them.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tool names follow a consistent verb-object snake_case pattern (search_, get_, list_)) with clearly descriptive objects. The verbs are appropriate for the action, and no mixed conventions or vague generic names are present.

    Tool Count5/5

    Five tools is well within the ideal range for a focused read-only evidence retrieval server. Each tool covers a necessary part of the search-and-retrieval workflow without bloat or missing essentials.

    Completeness5/5

    The tool surface covers the full workflow: search across transcripts, fetch exact evidence, browse episode metadata, check indexing coverage, and read surrounding passages. No obvious dead ends or missing operations for the stated purpose.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues