trace_procurement_lifecycle

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided; description states it returns a timeline and is read-only based on context, but does not disclose side effects, auth needs, or rate limits.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two concise sentences in Korean followed by Args list. Front-loaded with purpose and value. No wasted words.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Output schema exists, so return values are covered. Description explains all parameters and basic behavior. Lacks error handling or edge case details, but sufficient for standard use.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema descriptions coverage is 0%, but description adds meaning by explaining id_type enum values and naming the parameters. Could further elaborate on id_value format and business_type options.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Description clearly states it traces the entire procurement lifecycle from pre-spec to contract, returning a timeline. It distinguishes itself from siblings like search_procurement, get_procurement_detail, etc., which are for specific aspects.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No explicit when-to-use or when-not-to-use comparisons with siblings. The description implies it's for full lifecycle tracing, but lacks direct guidance on alternatives.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.