Skip to main content
Glama
kvoltmer

Audionaut MCP Server

by kvoltmer
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to Audionaut MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • openDAW MCP

      ameobius-ai
      A
      license
      B
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      MCP server for headless, agent-native control of openDAW, enabling programmatic music production with tracks, instruments, effects, MIDI, automation, and rendering via 543 tools.
      2
      100
      Apache 2.0

    • PampaPilot MCP Server

      LeoLisena
      F
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      MCP server for controlling REAPER digital audio workstation from natural language. It enables AI agents to create tracks, import audio, adjust mix parameters, and manage sessions through typed operations and a REAPER bridge.
      22
      -

    • Podcast MCP

      calebn
      A
      license
      C
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables podcast producers and agents to manage multitrack projects, run per-track transcription, perform transcript-driven edits, process audio via FFmpeg, and inspect a read-only DAW timeline over MCP.
      183
      MIT

    • reaper-mcp

      vecnode
      A
      license
      B
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      This MCP server enables AI assistants to control a live REAPER DAW instance, including transport, tracks, FX, MIDI, media, markers, rendering, and project state, with an escape hatch for arbitrary ReaScript commands.
      40
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A3.6/5.0

    Scored across 22 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools target clearly distinct actions: project setup, import/export, clip/region/track/channel removal, clip gain/speed/fades, analysis, and feedback. Minor possible confusion exists between move_clip and place_clip, and between remove_clip and cleanup_regions, but descriptions clarify the boundaries.

    Naming Consistency3/5

    All names use snake_case, but the verb patterns are mixed: bare verbs (assemble, split, analyze), verb_noun (create_region, remove_clip), and noun_noun attribute setters (clip_gain, clip_speed, clip_fades). The set is readable but not predictable.

    Tool Count3/5

    22 tools is heavy for a single MCP server; while each appears to cover a real audio-editing operation, the set falls in the borderline-heavy 16-25 range and could likely be consolidated somewhat.

    Completeness4/5

    The surface covers project lifecycle, import/export, clip/region/track/channel removal, clip editing, analysis, assembly, and feedback. Gaps such as add_channel, rename_track, or explicit set_tempo exist, but they are either workaroundable or less central to the core editing workflows.

    Maintenance

    ActivityActive
    ResponsivenessWithin a week

    Resources