Three tools center on evaluating events (event_readiness, assess_event, options_readiness), and an agent could initially struggle to pick between classifying a catalyst's lifecycle stage and assessing a user-supplied event. The descriptions do draw boundaries (classification vs. unverified assessment vs. evidence-completeness check), but the conceptual overlap keeps this from being clean.

The set mixes noun-phrase names (event_readiness, options_readiness, upcoming_events) with verb_noun names (assess_event, assess_level), giving two distinct conventions within five tools. Names remain readable and snake_case throughout, but the pattern is not predictable.

Five tools is well within the reasonable range for a narrow catalyst/event-readiness domain, and each tool maps to a distinct step in the workflow. The only minor concern is that the surface is thin enough that some tools feel like fragments of a larger lifecycle.

The set covers discovery (upcoming_events), classification (event_readiness), user-event assessment, evidence checking, and level analysis, but stops there. There is no way to fetch detail on a specific catalyst, register or track an event over time, or revisit resolved events, which are natural gaps for a catalyst-tracking server.