video-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to video-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceIntegrates with OpenAI's Sora 2 API to generate, remix, and manage AI-generated videos from text prompts. Supports video creation, status monitoring, downloading, and remixing through natural language commands.208MIT
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to generate, manage, and download AI-generated videos using OpenAI's Sora models, supporting text prompts, image-to-video, remixing, and more.9MIT

Heygen MCP Serverofficial
AlicenseNot gradedqualityNot gradedmaintenanceEnables Claude Desktop and Agents to generate AI avatars and videos through the HeyGen API, providing tools to create and manage avatar videos with specified text and voice options.113 PyPI44MIT- AlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceExposes Replicate's FLUX image generation models to Claude, enabling text-to-image generation, image variations, inpainting, and edge-guided creation with 6 different FLUX models.21MIT
- AlicenseBqualityCmaintenanceProvides Claude Code with local ffmpeg-based tools to probe, trim, concat, transform, overlay, mix audio, render JSON timelines, and run automated QA on video files—no API key required.9Apache 2.0
- AlicenseBqualityBmaintenanceEnables AI agents to create Vidu image-to-video and reference-to-video generation tasks, poll asynchronous results, and check pricing across two model variants. Works from Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, VS Code, and other MCP-compatible hosts.5253 npmApache 2.0
TDQS
Scored across 3 tools
Each tool maps to a distinct step in an asynchronous pipeline: creation (generate_video), polling (check_video), and retrieval (download_video). There is no overlap in purpose, and the descriptions explicitly chain them (generate returns an ID for check_video, check_video returns a URL for download_video).
All three names follow a strict verb_noun pattern (generate_video, check_video, download_video) with a shared 'video' resource noun. Fully predictable and consistent.
Three tools are minimal but each earns its place in the async generation workflow, with no bloat. It is at the low end of the scale, so slightly thin for anything beyond single-video generation.
The generate → poll → download lifecycle is fully covered, so an agent can complete the core task end to end. Minor gaps exist: no cancel/delete for a stuck prediction, no way to list past predictions, and no model discovery tool.