Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to market-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      C
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      An MCP server providing stock market data and trading capabilities through multiple broker APIs including Robinhood and Schwab.
      100
      47 PyPI
      9
      Apache 2.0
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      A remote Model Context Protocol (MCP) server for real-time cryptocurrency and stock market analysis. Provides AI-powered market intelligence tools with 9 theory-based analysis engines, multi-chain DEX discovery, and enterprise features.
      -
    • -
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      Not graded
      maintenance
      Real-time financial market data MCP server. Stocks, crypto, technicals, sentiment, FDA calendar. No API keys required.
      -
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      An MCP server that provides AI-powered financial intelligence tools, including stock advisory, technical analysis, prediction, portfolio optimization, and market regime detection for Indian markets.
      -
    • A
      license
      C
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      MCP server that provides a unified prediction market API for multiple venues like Polymarket and Kalshi, allowing AI agents to discover markets, fetch order books, and execute trades through a single interface.
      32
      262 npm
      8
      MIT
    • F
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      An advanced MCP server for real-time worldwide stock market data, technical indicators, financials, news, and Python sandboxing with AI models, supporting US and Indian markets.
      29
      1
      -

    TDQS

    A4/5.0

    Scored across 20 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool targets a distinct purpose: price fetching, technical analysis, screening, prediction markets, and backtesting are clearly separated. Even within similar areas like screeners, descriptions clarify the difference (e.g., price-based vs. technical-setup scans). No two tools are interchangeable.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    All names use snake_case and are descriptive, with a consistent pattern within subdomains (e.g., prediction_* prefix, get_* for price retrieval, *_screener for screeners). The mix of verb-first (list_strategies) and noun-first (technical_analysis) is a minor deviation but not confusing.

    Tool Count3/5

    At 20 tools, this is on the heavy side, but the breadth of the domain (market data, technical analysis, screeners, prediction markets, backtesting) justifies many of them. Still, the count approaches the 'too many' threshold, and some redundancy like get_price vs. get_prices adds to the load.

    Completeness4/5

    The toolset covers a wide lifecycle: fetching prices, searching symbols, running analysis, screening, prediction market exploration, and backtesting with validation. The main gap is the lack of a direct historical OHLCV endpoint for raw price data, which would be useful for charting or custom analysis.

    Maintenance

    ActivityActive
    ResponsivenessNo issues