wormhole-metrics-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to wormhole-metrics-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceAn MCP server that tracks daily activity and graduate metrics across multiple Solana launchpads.41MIT
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceAn MCP server that enables cross-chain token transfers via the Stargate protocol.41MIT
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceAn MCP server that tracks trading volume metrics segmented by DEX, blockchain, aggregator, frontend, and Telegram bot.101MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceAn MCP server that connects Hermes Agent to the Solana blockchain, enabling natural language queries for wallets, tokens, NFTs, transactions, whale movements, and network health.6MIT

orbit-apiofficial
FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceMCP server for cross-chain bridging, enabling AI agents to find routes, estimate costs, check risks, execute transfers, and track status across blockchains.-- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceAn MCP server that retrieves statistics from top protocols in the Mantle Network to help users make more informed investment decisions.-
TDQS
Scored across 7 tools
Most tools have clearly distinct purposes focused on different Wormhole metrics (cross-chain activity, KPIs, money flow, corridors, assets, chain pairs, symbols). However, get_top_assets_by_volume and get_top_symbols_by_volume could potentially overlap in scope since symbols often represent assets, though their descriptions suggest different data dimensions.
All tools follow a consistent verb_noun pattern with 'get_' prefix and descriptive names (e.g., get_cross_chain_activity, get_kpi_list). The naming is uniform throughout the set with no deviations in style or structure.
7 tools is well-scoped for a metrics-focused MCP server. Each tool addresses a specific aspect of Wormhole analytics (activity, KPIs, flows, top items), and none appear redundant or unnecessary for the domain.
The toolset provides comprehensive coverage for fetching Wormhole metrics data across key dimensions (activity, flows, top items, KPIs). A minor gap exists in lacking tools for historical trend analysis or comparative metrics over time, but core data retrieval is well-covered.