uniswap-pools-mcp
Server Configuration
Describes the environment variables required to run the server.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Instructions
Guidance the server publishes about itself, which clients place ahead of the tool catalog so the model reads it before choosing anything.
This server publishes no instructions, or was last inspected before Glama recorded them.
Capabilities
Server capabilities have not been inspected yet.
Tools
Functions exposed to the LLM to take actions
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
| get_token_poolsA | |
| get_token_pools_v2A | |
| get_token_pools_v3A | |
| get_token_pools_v4A | |
| get_pool_dataA | |
Prompts
Interactive templates invoked by user choice
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
No prompts | |
Resources
Contextual data attached and managed by the client
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
No resources | |
TDQS
Scored across 5 tools
There is significant overlap between get_token_pools and the version-specific tools (get_token_pools_v2/v3/v4), as they all retrieve pools for a token with similar outputs. However, get_pool_data is clearly distinct for querying a specific pool by ID. The descriptions help clarify that get_token_pools aggregates across versions while others are version-specific, but agents might still be confused about when to use which.
The naming follows a consistent snake_case verb_noun pattern throughout (e.g., get_pool_data, get_token_pools). The only deviation is the addition of version suffixes (v2, v3, v4) for some tools, which is logical but slightly breaks the pure verb_noun convention. Overall, the naming is predictable and readable.
With 5 tools, the count is well-scoped for querying Uniswap pools, covering specific pool data and token-based queries across versions. It's slightly lean but reasonable, as each tool serves a purpose. A few more tools for broader operations (e.g., list_all_pools) could enhance it, but it's not a significant gap.
The toolset covers querying pools by ID and by token across Uniswap versions, which is a focused domain. However, there are notable gaps: no tools for creating, updating, or deleting pools (if applicable), and no broader operations like listing all pools or searching by other criteria. This limits agents to read-only queries, which may be sufficient but feels incomplete for full pool management.