Skip to main content
Glama
Sign In
kukapay

ens-mcp

by kukapay
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Remote

Related Servers

Alternatives to ens-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • mcp-server-dns

      ofershap
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      MCP server for DNS lookups, reverse DNS, WHOIS, and domain checks. Zero auth, zero config.
      5
      50 npm
      3
      MIT

    • Web3 DNS

      krizis78
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Read-only MCP server that lets AI agents resolve DNS domains, .cns names and ENS names to owners, public profiles and freshly verified on-chain payment addresses across 28 networks, so agents can pay an address the owner actually published. It exposes lookup, payment-address, reverse-lookup, availability and network-listing tools without any ability to sign, register or move funds.
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    B3.2/5.0

    Scored across 3 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose: get_domain_details retrieves comprehensive domain information, get_domain_events focuses on event history, and resolve_ens_name performs a specific address resolution. There is no overlap or ambiguity between these functions.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tools follow a consistent verb_noun naming pattern (get_domain_details, get_domain_events, resolve_ens_name), using snake_case throughout. The verbs 'get' and 'resolve' are appropriately descriptive and maintain a predictable structure.

    Tool Count3/5

    With only 3 tools, the set feels somewhat thin for an ENS domain management server. While the tools cover key read operations, the scope could benefit from additional tools for broader ENS interactions, such as registration or ownership updates, to better support agent workflows.

    Completeness3/5

    The tools provide good read coverage for ENS domains (details, events, resolution), but there are notable gaps for write operations like registering, updating, or transferring domains. This limits the server's ability to handle full domain lifecycle management, though agents can work with the available read functions.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources