dao-proposals-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to dao-proposals-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceAn MCP server that enables LLMs to query DAOs, proposals, and voting data from Tally's blockchain governance API across multiple networks.16MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceAn MCP server that gives AI agents real-time access to DeFi across multiple chains, enabling non-custodial crypto trading, portfolio queries, and transaction execution.147MIT
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceAn MCP server that provides AI agents with real-time access to DEX liquidity pool data, enabling smarter trading, analytics, and automated strategies.101MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceMulti-chain MCP server enabling AI agents to interact with Arbitrum — ERC-8004 identity registration, GMX ecosystem integration, cross-chain reputation via RepuLayer, and 37 governance tools across 6 chains.12MIT
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceAn MCP server that provides AI agents with real-time access to curated Web3 jobs.18MIT
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceAn MCP server that powers AI agents with indexed blockchain data from The Graph.3MIT
TDQS
Scored across 3 tools
Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose: get_proposal_details fetches details for a specific proposal, list_proposals lists recent proposals for a space, and list_spaces lists available spaces. There is no overlap in functionality, making it easy for an agent to select the right tool.
All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern (get_proposal_details, list_proposals, list_spaces) using snake_case. The naming is predictable and readable, with no deviations in style or convention.
With only 3 tools, the server feels thin for a DAO proposals domain, as it lacks operations like creating, updating, or voting on proposals. While the tools cover basic read functions, the scope suggests more actions would be needed for full workflow support.
The toolset is severely incomplete for managing DAO proposals, as it only provides read operations (get and list) without any write capabilities such as creating, updating, deleting, or voting on proposals. This creates significant gaps that will hinder agent workflows in this domain.