Skip to main content
Glama
kud

SonarQube MCP

by kud
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
TypeScript
Remote

Related Servers

Alternatives to SonarQube MCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • sonarless-mcp

      BrainerVirus
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Gives AI coding agents a shared local SonarQube instance plus a SonarQube MCP endpoint per machine, so multiple clients can run scans, wait on quality gates, and read metrics and issues for the auto-detected project in a workspace. Tools also accept an optional server argument to query configured remote SonarQube servers (such as a company CI server) alongside the local one.
      -

    • SonarQube MCP Server

      anggakawa
      F
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A read-only MCP server that provides AI assistants with structured access to SonarQube projects, issues, metrics, and rules. It enables safe analysis of code quality and security findings through a set of validated, safety-first tools.
      6
      -
    • PrufGate MCP by GuardianVigil-Labs

      PrufGate MCPofficial

      GuardianVigil-Labs
      A
      license
      B
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Exposes nine read-only tools that let a coding agent audit a repository for fabricated fallbacks, hollow or weakened tests, silently disabled checks and missing authorization scoping. Agents can run the six deterministic engines on changed or whole-repository code and get structured findings back without modifying anything.
      9
      1
      Apache 2.0
    Deploy Server
    Shareable, User-Owned Context BackendPeople, applications, and agents read, write, and coordinate together in one context lake. Reach it over MCP, a CLI, a Python SDK, or REST.fulcradynamics.comAd

    TDQS

    A3.7/5.0

    Scored across 6 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools target clearly distinct resources: projects, branches, issues, issue source, measures, and quality gate. There is some potential overlap between sonarqube_quality_gate and sonarqube_measures because both surface ratings/metrics, and sonarqube_branches also includes quality gate status, but the descriptions make their scopes sufficiently distinct.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tools use a consistent sonarqube_ prefix and snake_case resource-oriented naming. The convention is predictable throughout, with no mixed camelCase or inconsistent verb styles.

    Tool Count5/5

    Six tools is well within the appropriate range and each tool maps to a core read-only SonarQube workflow. The surface is focused without obvious redundant tools.

    Completeness4/5

    The set covers project discovery, branches, unresolved issues, source context, measures, and quality gate explanation, forming a coherent triage workflow. Minor gaps exist for adjacent SonarQube data such as security hotspots and rule metadata, but core agent needs are covered.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources