restore_feature_flag

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Description discloses that the tool reverses a kill operation, but with no annotations, more detail would be beneficial (e.g., requires the flag to be killed first, effect on other settings). Still adequate for basic understanding.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Single sentence that is front-loaded and clear. No wasted words, though could be slightly more structured.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Lacks return value or success/error indication (no output schema). For a mutation tool, this is acceptable but not exemplary. Context signals show no additional info.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema descriptions cover 100% of parameters, so the description adds no extra meaning beyond the schema. Baseline score of 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the specific action (restore/re-enable) on a specific resource (killed feature flag) in a specific context (environment). It directly contrasts with sibling tools like kill_feature_flag.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies when to use the tool (when a feature flag is killed and needs re-enabling) but does not explicitly state when not to use it or mention alternatives. No guidance on prerequisites or side effects.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.