mcp-server-ktozvonil
Server Configuration
Describes the environment variables required to run the server.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| KTOZVONIL_TOKEN | No | OAuth bearer token — only needed for post_comment | |
| KTOZVONIL_MCP_URL | No | Override the endpoint URL (default https://ktozvonil.net/mcp) | https://ktozvonil.net/mcp |
Instructions
Guidance the server publishes about itself, which clients place ahead of the tool catalog so the model reads it before choosing anything.
This server publishes no instructions, or was last inspected before Glama recorded them.
Capabilities
Features and capabilities supported by this server
Protocol revision2025-11-25
| Capability | Details |
|---|---|
| tools | {} |
Tools
Functions exposed to the LLM to take actions
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
| lookup_phoneA | Look up a phone number on ktozvonil.net: community verdict, rating, spam level, operator, region, tags and recent reviews. |
| post_commentA | Post a phone-number review on behalf of the authenticated user. Requires an OAuth access token with the "write" scope (discover via /.well-known/oauth-protected-resource). The review is labelled AI-agent-generated, shown in a separate section, and does NOT affect the community rating or verdict. |
Prompts
Interactive templates invoked by user choice
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
No prompts | |
Resources
Contextual data attached and managed by the client
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
No resources | |
TDQS
Scored across 2 tools
The two tools have clearly distinct purposes: one for querying phone number information, the other for posting a review. No overlap in functionality.
Both tools follow a consistent verb_noun pattern: 'lookup_phone' and 'post_comment'. Names are clear and predictable.
With only 2 tools, the server feels minimal but arguably covers the core use case (lookup and contribute). However, it is on the low end of the range.
The server provides read and write capabilities for phone number reviews, but lacks update/delete or moderation features. Basic workflow is covered, but there are notable gaps for a full review lifecycle.