Skip to main content
Glama
ktmcp-cli

frankiefin

by ktmcp-cli

Related Servers

Alternatives to frankiefin

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables identity verification from any MCP client by providing tools to create verification sessions, generate capture links, screen against sanctions and PEP lists, read results, and manage the review queue.
      22 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      MCP server that compares Brazilian identity data (CPF, name, birth, address) and returns a similarity score against official records, enabling identity verification through natural language.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Provides 8 financial-grade KYC identity verification tools for AI agents, including face comparison, liveness detection, document OCR, and risk media labeling.
      8
      67 npm
      4
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables KYC (Know Your Customer) verification through API integration, supporting PAN card verification, PAN-Aadhaar link checking, and identity validation with advanced caching and rate limiting.
      -
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Provides AI agents with compliance screening (OFAC sanctions, risk scoring, Know-Your-Agent) plus disposable email and SMS verification for OTPs, accessible via MCP tools, HTTP API, and CLI.
      10
      2
      MIT

    TDQS

    C2.4/5.0

    Scored across 46 tools

    Disambiguation3/5

    Many tools are clearly separated by Create/Update/Delete/Query prefixes, but the sheer number of Create/Update variants for documents and IDs, along with overlapping terms like 'Check', 'Search', and 'Query', creates boundary ambiguity. Descriptions help in most cases, but an agent could easily pick the wrong variant when dealing with entities vs organisations or document details vs full document scans.

    Naming Consistency3/5

    Most tools follow a PascalCase Verb+Object pattern such as CreateEntity or DeleteDocument, which is readable. However, tools like InternationalBusinessProfile, BusinessOwnershipQuery, EntityMonitoring, StatusCheck, and notifyResult break the pattern with noun-first names or inconsistent casing and word order, making the naming mixed rather than uniform.

    Tool Count2/5

    At 46 tools, the surface is well beyond the typical well-scoped range of 3-15 and even beyond the 25+ threshold for 'too many'. The domain is broad, but many tools are variations of the same create/update operation and could likely be consolidated via parameters or narrower tool groupings.

    Completeness4/5

    The tool set covers full CRUD-style lifecycles for both documents and entities, plus state management, checks, IDV, reporting, and service status. Some gaps exist, such as no dedicated list/report operations and no obvious way to update document check results, but most workflows can be completed through Query/Search and Update variants.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues