run_automation_now

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description adds the permission requirement and notes that it records the result, providing some behavioral context. However, it does not disclose potential side effects of running the automation or any execution details. Annotations already indicate non-read-only, so this is a modest addition.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, front-loaded sentence that conveys purpose, behavior, and permission in a compact way. Every word adds value, with no redundancy or filler.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple trigger tool with one parameter and no output schema, the description covers the core purpose and permission. However, it does not mention what the caller should expect after invocation (e.g., a run ID, status), nor does it warn about side effects, which could be significant since running an automation may perform arbitrary actions.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The only parameter 'id' is a string with no schema-level description. The description implies that this id identifies the automation to run, which is useful, but it does not explicitly explain the id's format, source, or how it relates to 'configured automation.' With 0% schema description coverage, the description only partially compensates.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states 'Run a configured automation immediately and record the result,' using a specific verb and target resource. It distinguishes this tool from siblings like list_automations or run_agent by focusing on executing an already-configured automation.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description indicates when to use the tool (to run a configured automation now) and mentions the required permission (allow_automations). It does not explicitly name alternatives or when-not-to-use scenarios, but the phrase 'configured automation' helps differentiate from similar sibling tools.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.